• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Langton on things in themselves: a critique of Kantian humility
【24h】

Langton on things in themselves: a critique of Kantian humility

机译：兰顿对自己的事情：对康德谦卑的批判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ever since the Critique of pure reason was published, Kant's notion of the thing in itself has provoked puzzlement and controversy. How could Kant postulate the existence of, and the affection of our sensibility by, things in themselves but claim that we cannot know anything about these things in themselves? An answer to this question lies at the heart of understanding Kantian thought. Kant's aim in the Critique is to give a critical examination of the possibility of human cognition. His result is the theory of transcendental idealism, central to which are the notion of the thing in itself and the corresponding notion of the phenomenon. Kant limits the realm of knowledge to the phenomenal world; things in themselves remain outside it. Getting clear about these notions and their relation is therefore necessary for understanding what it is, according to Kant, that we are capable of knowing, and how. In her book Kantian humility, Rae Langton offers a metaphysical interpretation of Kant's notion of the thing in itself and a solution to the "old problem". But while Langton's interpretation provides an answer to the above question, it poses a fundamental challenge for a transcendental idealist reading of Kant. In the present essay I assess the adequacy of Langton's argument. I propose the following criterion for adequacy of textual interpretations. The interpretation needs to make sense of the text concerned with the problem under consideration. But it should not do so at the cost of damaging the coherence of the text as a whole.
机译：自从发表《纯粹理性批判》以来，康德关于事物本身的观念就引起了困惑和争议。康德如何推测事物本身的存在以及我们对事物的敏感性的影响，却声称我们对这些事物本身一无所知？这个问题的答案是理解康德思想的核心。康德在《批判》中的目的是对人类认知的可能性进行批判性的考察。他的结果是先验唯心主义理论，其核心是事物本身的概念和现象的相应概念。康德将知识领域限制在现象世界中。事物本身仍然在它外面。因此，要弄清楚这些概念及其关系，对理解我们有能力知道的，以及如何知道的意义是必要的。雷·兰顿（Rae Langton）在她的《康德谦卑》一书中，对康德关于事物本身的概念进行了形而上的解释，并提出了“老问题”的解决方案。但是，尽管兰顿的解释为上述问题提供了答案，但对先验唯心主义者对康德的解读提出了根本的挑战。在本文中，我评估了兰顿论点的适当性。我为文本解释的适当性提出以下标准。解释需要使与所考虑问题有关的文字有意义。但这不应以损害整个案文的连贯性为代价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号