Rethinking the Learning Society: Giorgio Agamben on Studying, Stupidity, and Impotence

Tyson E. Lewis

首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Philosophy and Education >Rethinking the Learning Society: Giorgio Agamben on Studying, Stupidity, and Impotence

【24h】

Rethinking the Learning Society: Giorgio Agamben on Studying, Stupidity, and Impotence

机译：重新思考学习型社会：Giorgio Agamben关于学习，愚蠢和阳Imp

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In this article, the author rethinks critiques of the learning society using Giorgio Agamben’s theory of potentiality. Summarizing several major contributions to our understanding of the limitations of the discourse of learning, the author proposes that critics thus far have failed to fully pinpoint the exact danger of learning. Importantly, learning is not only a rejection of the democratic or political dimension of education but it is first and foremost predicated on a false ontology of potentiality. What is put at risk in learning is a sacrifice of our (im)potential, our capacity to be or not to be this or that within the order of things. Through a reconstruction of Agamben’s theory of studying, the author argues for a different conceptualization of freedom in education, of teaching, and of the time of education.

机译：在本文中，作者使用乔治·阿甘本（Giorgio Agamben）的潜能理论重新思考了对学习型社会的批评。总结了对我们理解学习话语局限性的几项主要贡献，作者认为，迄今为止，批评家们未能完全指出学习的确切危险。重要的是，学习不仅是拒绝民主或政治教育，而且首先是基于对潜能的错误本体论。在学习中面临的风险是对我们（潜在）潜力的牺牲，即我们在事物顺序中成为或不成为事物的能力。通过重构阿甘本的学习理论，作者主张对教育，教学和教育时间进行不同的概念化。

著录项

来源
《Studies in Philosophy and Education》 |2011年第6期|p.585-599|共15页
作者
Tyson E. Lewis;
展开▼
作者单位

Montclair State University, University Hall, Rm 2131, Montclair, NJ, USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
Learning; Learning society; Giorgio Agamben; Study; Potentiality; Stupidity; Democracy; Neoliberalism;

机译：学习;学习型社会;阿吉本（Giorgio Agamben）;研究;潜能;愚蠢;民主;新自由主义;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Reading technocratic exceptionalism through economic theology: Giorgio Agamben, Jacqueline Best, and the completion of the 'double paradigm' of sovereignty [J] . Murphy Michael P. A. International Politics . 2021,第5期

机译：通过经济神学阅读技术专家异常主义：Giorgio Agamben，Jacqueline Best，以及主权的“双重范式”
2. Il Bilderatlas nello studio di Giorgio Agamben. Note sul montaggio nell’iconotesto contemporaneo [J] . Lavinia Torti LEA . 2020,第25期

机译：在Giorgio Agamben研究中的Bilderatlas。关于当代iconotesto的装配注意事项
3. The Notion of “Device” in Giorgio Agamben [J] . Rubén Dittus Advances in Applied Sociology . 2019,第1期

机译：乔治·阿甘本（Giorgio Agamben）中的“设备”概念
4. Rethinking Quantitative Skills inaData-Driven Society: AView from the Middle East [C] . Loris Serafino, Sadeq Damrah IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference . 2020

机译：重新思考数据驱动型社会中的定量技能：来自中东的观点
5. Corrosive Subjectifications: Theorizing Radical Politics of Art Education in the Intersection of Jacques Ranciere and Giorgio Agamben. [D] . Tervo, Juuso Ville. 2014

机译：腐蚀性主观：雅克·兰西埃（Jacques Ranciere）和乔治·阿甘本（Giorgio Agamben）交叉口的艺术教育激进政治理论。
6. Dementia and the Paradigm of the Camp: Thinking Beyond Giorgio Agamben’s Concept of Bare Life [O] . Lucy Burke -1

机译：痴呆症和营地范式：超越乔治·阿甘本（Giorgio Agamben）的光明人生概念
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考

Rethinking the Learning Society: Giorgio Agamben on Studying, Stupidity, and Impotence

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅