• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Philosophy and Education >Quo Vadis? The Capability Space and New Directions for the Philosophy of Educational Research
【24h】

Quo Vadis? The Capability Space and New Directions for the Philosophy of Educational Research

机译：Qu Vadis？教育研究哲学的能力空间和新方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Amartya Sen’s capability approach creates an evaluative space within which individual well-being is considered in ways that diverge from dominant utilitarian views. Instead of measuring well-being based on the accumulation of wealth and resources by individuals and nations, the capability approach focuses on the opportunities (capabilities) an individual has to choose and pursue a life they have reason to value. The capability space is introduced with an explanation of Sen’s evaluative framework. It is claimed that conceptions of well-being are inextricably linked to our values and views of what constitutes justice, the ‘good life’ and notions of human flourishing. The paper invites philosophical reflection on how the capability approach can inform the development of a research paradigm that furthers our understandings of individual well-being and human flourishing. A specific focus is given to what more can be done to assist children and young people in making the best of their situation in negotiating a valued life for themselves in which they can flourish.
机译：阿玛蒂亚·森（Amartya Sen）的能力方法创造了一个评估空间，在该空间中，个人福利被认为不​​同于主流功利主义观点。能力方法不是基于个人和国家积累的财富和资源来衡量幸福感，而是侧重于个人必须选择和追求自己有理由重视的生活的机会（能力）。在功能空间中介绍了Sen的评估框架。有人声称，幸福感与我们的价值观和对正义，“美好生活”以及人类繁荣的观念的看法有着千丝万缕的联系。本文就能力方法如何为研究范式的发展提供哲学思考，该研究范式进一步加深了我们对个人福祉和人类繁荣的理解。特别着重于可以做些什么，以协助儿童和年轻人充分利用自己的处境，为自己谋求宝贵的生活进行谈判，使他们能够蓬勃发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号