• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译：大肠手术中的手辅助或腹腔镜辅助方法：系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Evidence of benefits of laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted colectomies (LAC) over open procedures in gastrointestinal surgery has continued to accumulate. With its wide implementation, technical difficulties and limitations of LAC have become clear. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was introduced in an attempt to facilitate the transition from open techniques to minimally invasive procedures. Continuing debate exists about which approach is to be preferred, HALS or LAC. Several studies have compared these two techniques in colorectal surgery, but no single study provided evidence which procedure is superior. Therefore, a systematic review was carried out comparing HALS with LAC colorectal resection.
机译：与胃肠道手术中的开放手术相比，腹腔镜和腹腔镜辅助的Colectomies（LAC）获益的证据不断积累。随着LAC的广泛实施，LAC的技术难题和局限性已变得显而易见。为了促进从开放技术向微创​​手术的过渡，引入了手动腹腔镜手术（HALS）。关于首选哪种方法，HALS或LAC，存在持续的争论。几项研究在结直肠外科手术中比较了这两种技术，但没有一项研究提供证据证明哪种方法更好。因此，进行了系统评价，比较了HALS与LAC大肠切除术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号