...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability science >The trade-offs of win-win conservation rhetoric: exploring place meanings in community conservation on the Wild Coast, South Africa
【24h】

The trade-offs of win-win conservation rhetoric: exploring place meanings in community conservation on the Wild Coast, South Africa

机译：双赢的保护措辞的取舍：探索南非野生海岸社区保护中的地方意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In attempts to reconcile conservation and development for poverty alleviation by establishing protected areas, economic values of nature and compensation for loss of access to resources are often prioritized over cultural and personal values. Additionally, conservation interventions in local communities are often hindered by contested visions of sustainability. We explore the utility of place meanings to unpack diverse local interests by examining an intervention that proposed to establish a fenced protected area in a community on the Wild Coast, South Africa. We describe the narratives that argue for or against the project and how they make use of the place meanings attributed to parts of the landscape, including forest, communal grazing land and plantations. We then examine the coalitions behind narratives: groups of actors who share the meanings and constructs of the problem and who employ these for a particular strategy. This allows us to map the negotiation process, and understand how community dissent influences the project. We find that a focus on economic benefits from protected areas neglects alternative meanings, e.g. cultural and spiritual value of forests as well as potential alternative pathways for development such as investing in small-scale agriculture. Our analysis reveals the tension that exists in the win-win' discourse of conservation between the rhetoric of sustainable resource use and co-management as well as a trend back towards fortress conservation'. A community counter-narrative is successfulin stalling the project which illustrates the importance of considering the plurality of meanings for interventions to be sustainable in the long term.
机译：在试图通过建立保护区来调和保护与发展以减轻贫困的过程中，自然的经济价值和对获得资源的损失的补偿常常被置于文化和个人价值之上。此外，人们对可持续性的看法相互矛盾，常常阻碍了当地社区的保护措​​施。我们通过研究一项提议在南非野生海岸的社区中建立围栏保护区的干预措施，来探索地方意义的效用，以解开各种当地利益。我们描述了支持或反对该项目的叙事，以及它们如何利用归因于景观的部分的地方含义，包括森林，公共牧场和种植园。然后，我们研究叙事背后的联盟：行动者群体，他们共享问题的含义和构造，并将其运用到特定的策略中。这使我们能够绘制谈判过程图，并了解社区异议如何影响项目。我们发现，对保护区的经济利益的关注忽略了其他含义，例如森林的文化和精神价值，以及潜在的替代发展途径，例如对小型农业的投资。我们的分析揭示了在资源的可持续利用和共同管理之间的矛盾，以及向堡垒保护的趋势之间，在保护共赢的讨论中存在着张力。社区反叙事成功地阻止了该项目，这说明了考虑多种含义以使干预措施长期可持续的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号