...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability science >Understanding social-ecological vulnerability with Q-methodology: a case study of water-based ecosystem services in Wyoming, USA
【24h】

Understanding social-ecological vulnerability with Q-methodology: a case study of water-based ecosystem services in Wyoming, USA

机译：用Q方法学来理解社会生态脆弱性：以美国怀俄明州的水基生态系统服务为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A broad range of participatory methods can be employed to understand the vulnerability of social-ecological systems threatened by various drivers of change including climate change and land-use change. Understanding this vulnerability is critical for managing natural resources, particularly water resources that flow across jurisdictional boundaries, and support conflicting uses. This paper demonstrates Q-methodology, a promising participatory method infrequently applied in the vulnerability context, with a case study investigation of the vulnerability of stakeholders reliant on water-based ecosystem services derived from the Shoshone National Forest in Wyoming, USA. The approach identified four distinct viewpoints regarding vulnerability, including an environmental perspective, agricultural perspective, Native American perspective, and recreation perspective. The distinct viewpoints highlighted disparate levels of importance related to 34 water benefits, such as commercial irrigation, oil and natural gas extraction, river-based fishing, and cultural and spiritual use. A diverse range of drivers of change threatening important water benefits were also identified, including pollution, too much management intervention, and development of recreation opportunities. The potential benefits of Q-methodology for vulnerability assessment include a rank-ordering exercise that elicits preferences for tradeoffs, and statistical derivation of a small number of perspectives about the topic.
机译：可以采用广泛的参与方法来理解受各种变化驱动因素（包括气候变化和土地利用变化）威胁的社会生态系统的脆弱性。了解此漏洞对于管理自然资源，尤其是跨管辖范围流动的水资源并支持冲突的使用至关重要。本文演示了Q方法，一种在漏洞环境中很少应用的有前途的参与式方法，并通过案例研究调查了利益相关者的漏洞，他们依赖于美国怀俄明州肖肖尼国家森林的水基生态系统服务。该方法确定了关于脆弱性的四种不同观点，包括环境观点，农业观点，美国原住民观点和娱乐观点。不同的观点强调了与34种水利相关的不同程度的重要性，例如商业灌溉，石油和天然气开采，基于河的捕鱼以及文化和精神用途。还确定了威胁到重要水利的各种变化驱动因素，包括污染，过多的管理干预和娱乐机会的发展。 Q方法在脆弱性评估中​​的潜在好处包括可以优先权衡的等级排序练习，以及对该主题的少数观点的统计推导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号