...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainable Water Resources Management >Governance status in water management institutions in Barind Tract Northwest Bangladesh: an assessment based on stakeholder's perception
【24h】

Governance status in water management institutions in Barind Tract Northwest Bangladesh: an assessment based on stakeholder's perception

机译：孟加拉国巴林道西北地区水管理机构治理现状：基于利益攸关方的看法的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In Bangladesh, the approach of water sector emphasises on the agenda like infrastructural development to meet the needs, neglecting governance issues in the water management institutions (WMIs) to achieve their sustainable development. However, the Government of Bangladesh (GoB) is committed to work for SDG 2030 by addressing good governance issues in all sphere of its activities. In this context, present study is undertaken to assess the existing water governance status of the WMIs like the Barind Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA); the Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB); the Department of Public Health and Engineering (DPHE); and the Local Government and Engineering Department (LGED) as government agencies; and Development Association for Self-reliance, Communication and Health (DASCOH) is a nongovernment and non-profit organization selected purposively based on their activities in water sector in the drought-prone water scarce Barind Tract in the north-western part of country. The methodology for governance status assessment includes both quantitative and qualitative approaches; and eight indicators like institutions, transparency, accountability, participation, social equity, environmental integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness are taken into consideration where each indicator includes five sub-indicators. Considering individual performance, the assessment indicated that DASCOH Foundation performs 'good', BMDA and LGED show 'moderate', while BWDB and DPHE exhibited 'bad' performance. However, the overall governance status of WMIs falls under 'moderate' category. This result indicates that BWDB and DPHE should look into the governance issue seriously and take a rigorous action plan for its scaling up. On the other hand, BMDA and LGED should be careful about the indicators like transparency, accountability, participation, and social equity. The DASCOH Foundation is performing well by introducing noble concepts to institutionalise the Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) under BWA (2013). Finally, there exist gap in governance issues of WMIs in coordination, technical capacity, and transparency in project selection, implementation, and citizen's participation which should be considered seriously in managing water resources in sustainable manner.
机译：在孟加拉国，水部门的方法强调了基础设施发展的议程，以满足需求，忽视水管理机构（WMIs）的治理问题，以实现其可持续发展。但是，孟加拉国政府（Gob）致力于通过解决所有活动领域的良好治理问题来为SDG 2030工作。在这方面，进行了目前的研究，以评估WMI的现有水治理状况，如Barind Multipurpose Development管理局（BMDA）;孟加拉国水开发板（BWDB）;公共卫生和工程系（DPHE）;以及当地政府和工程部（LGEGE）作为政府机构;和自力更生，沟通和健康发展协会（Dascoh）是一项非政府和非营利组织，基于其在国家北部地区干旱易受水资源稀缺的水域中的水部门的活动。治理状况评估的方法包括定量和定性方法;和八个指标，如机构，透明度，问责制，参与，社会公平，环境完整性，效率和有效性，在每个指标包括五个子指标。考虑到个人表现，评估表明，Dascoh基金会表演了“良好”，BMDA和Lged Show'中等'，而BWDB和DPHE表现出“糟糕”的表现。但是，WMI的整体治理状况落在“中等”类别下。这一结果表明，BWDB和DPHE应该认真地研究治理问题，并采取严格的行动计划，以便进行扩大。另一方面，BMDA和LGED应该小心透明度，问责制，参与和社会公平的指标。 Dascoh基金会通过引入贵族概念来制度化BWA（2013年）综合水资源管理（IWRM）来表现良好。最后，WMI的治理问题存在差距，在项目选择，实施和公民参与中的协调，技术能力和透明度方面，应在可持续方式管理水资源方面被认为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号