...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Synthese >Structural realism versus standard scientific realism: the case of phlogiston and dephlogisticated air
【24h】

Structural realism versus standard scientific realism: the case of phlogiston and dephlogisticated air

机译：结构现实主义与标准科学现实主义：发火现象和空气变质的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this paper is to revisit the phlogiston theory to see what can be learned from it about the relationship between scientific realism, approximate truth and successful reference. It is argued that phlogiston theory did to some extent correctly describe the causal or nomological structure of the world, and that some of its central terms can be regarded as referring. However, it is concluded that the issue of whether or not theoretical terms successfully refer is not the key to formulating the appropriate form of scientific realism in response to arguments from theory change, and that the case of phlogiston theory is shown to be readily accommodated by ontic structural realism.
机译：本文的目的是重新审视火炸药理论，以了解从中可以学到的关于科学现实主义，近似真理和成功参考之间的关系的知识。有人认为，燃素论确实在某种程度上正确地描述了世界的因果或法​​理结构，并且其中的一些中心术语可以看作是指称。然而，得出的结论是，理论术语是否成功引用的问题并不是根据理论变革的论点制定适当形式的科学现实主义的关键，而且燃素论的案例很容易为人所接受。本体结构现实主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号