...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >The effects of forward and reverse engineering on firm innovation performance in the stages of technology catch-up: An empirical study of China
【24h】

The effects of forward and reverse engineering on firm innovation performance in the stages of technology catch-up: An empirical study of China

机译：技术追赶阶段的正向和反向工程对企业创新绩效的影响：中国的一项实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Due to the lack of novel technology, most emerging economies are adopting a technology catch-up strategy by first imitating and then innovating, which leads to a complex but important interaction between technology imitation and indigenous R&D activity, both of which play important roles in the innovation production process of emerging economies. Accordingly, this study proposes a new analytical framework that takes into account both forward engineering, mainly characterized by R&D novelty, and reverse engineering, mainly characterized by technology imitation. Based on this framework, this study offers an in-depth analysis of Chinese high-tech firms. The empirical results show that reverse engineering positively interacts with forward engineering; Firms with input in reverse engineering have more innovation output and a greater level of innovation commercialization than firms without input in reverse engineering. Forward engineering has a greater direct contribution to innovation output and innovation commercialization than reverse engineering. By comparison, the reverse engineering functions on innovation output mainly through indirect effect, which intensifies the role of forward engineering by providing the knowledge base for novel R&D activity. However, the ethicality and legitimacy of intellectual property behind reverse engineering frequently lead to international prosecutions, which may be the main reason that reverse engineering has an insignificant effect in the overseas market. Our study indicates that governments should initiate technological policy for technology development, and firm managers should improve indigenous innovation capacity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译：由于缺乏新技术，大多数新兴经济体通过首先模仿然后创新来采用技术追赶战略，这导致技术模仿与本土研发活动之间复杂而重要的相互作用，两者在全球技术创新中都起着重要作用。新兴经济体的创新生产过程。因此，本研究提出了一个新的分析框架，该框架兼顾了主要以研发新颖性为特征的正向工程和主要以技术模仿为特征的逆向工程。在此框架的基础上，本研究对中国高科技企业进行了深入分析。实证结果表明，逆向工程与正向工程之间存在正相关关系。与没有反向工程投入的企业相比，具有反向工程投入的企业拥有更多的创新产出和更高水平的创新商业化水平。与逆向工程相比，正向工程对创新产出和创新商业化的直接贡献更大。相比之下，逆向工程主要通过间接效应来影响创新产出，这通过为新颖的R＆D活动提供知识基础来增强正向工程的作用。但是，逆向工程背后的道德操守和合法性常常会导致国际起诉，这可能是逆向工程在海外市场影响不大的主要原因。我们的研究表明，政府应该为技术开发制定技术政策，而公司经理则应提高本地创新能力。 （C）2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号