Grenoble-GIANT Territorial Innovation Models: Are investments in research infrastructures worthwhile?

Scaringella Laurent; Chanaron Jean-Jacques

首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Grenoble-GIANT Territorial Innovation Models: Are investments in research infrastructures worthwhile?

【24h】

Grenoble-GIANT Territorial Innovation Models: Are investments in research infrastructures worthwhile?

机译：格勒诺布尔-捷安特地区创新模式：对研究基础设施的投资值得吗？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Over the past decades, the EU heavily invested in Research Infrastructures (RI). What are the expected returns of such investments? In the present article we address the question of returns on public funds/public infrastructures.

机译：在过去的几十年中，欧盟对研究基础设施（RI）进行了大量投资。这种投资的预期收益是多少？在本文中，我们讨论了公共资金/公共基础设施的收益问题。

著录项

来源
《Technological forecasting and social change》 |2016年第11期|92-101|共10页
作者
Scaringella Laurent; Chanaron Jean-Jacques;
展开▼
作者单位

ESC Rennes Sch Business, Int Mkt, 2 Rue Arbrissel CS 76522, F-35000 Rennes, France;

CNRS, F-75700 Paris, France|Grenoble Ecole Management, 12 Rue Pierre Semard BP 127, F-38003 Grenoble 01, France;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
Territorial Innovation Models; Research infrastructure; University; Socioeconomic impact; Start-up; Return on investment;

机译：地域创新模型;研究基础设施;大学;社会经济影响;启动;投资回报;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Editorial: From 'Territorial Innovation Models' to 'Territorial Knowledge Dynamics': On the Learning Value of a New Concept in Regional Studies [J] . Jeannerat Hugues, Crevoisier Olivier Regional Studies . 2016,第2期

机译：社论：从“地区创新模型”到“地区知识动态”：论区域研究中新概念的学习价值
2. Beyond Territorial Innovation Models: The Pertinence of the Territorial Approach [J] . OLIVIER CREVOISIER Regional Studies . 2014,第3期

机译：超越领域创新模式：领域方法的针对性
3. Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: Making a Difference to Territorial Innovation Models and Public Policy? [J] . LISE SMED OLSEN European Planning Studies . 2012,第11期

机译：地域知识动态：对地域创新模型和公共政策有影响吗？
4. Management, supervision and innovation of investment and financing of the urban infrastructure in developed country [C] . Chen Ling, Jia Ya-qin 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government . 2011

机译：发达国家城市基础设施投融资的管理，监督与创新
5. Public investment and infrastructure planning: A policy modelling approach for the Turkish investment sector. [D] . Arslan, Metin. 1993

机译：公共投资和基础设施规划：土耳其投资部门的政策建模方法。
6. Economic Modeling of Syndromic Surveillance Systems – ARoundtable Discussion on Association of State and Territorial HealthOfficial’s (ASTHO) Investment Decision Model [O] . Paula Soper, Scott Gordon, Marcus Rennick, 2015

机译：有症状监视系统的经济建模– A国家和领土卫生协会圆桌会议官员（ASTHO）的投资决策模型
7. Competing Recombinant Technologies for Environmental Innovation: Extending Arthur’s Model of Lock-in Abstract: This article presents a model of sequential decisions about investments in environmentally dirty and clean technologies, which extends the path-dependence framework of Arthur (1989). This allows us to evaluate if and how an economy locked into a dirty technology can be unlocked and move towards the clean technology. The main extension involves the inclusion of the effect of recombinant innovation of the two technologies. A mechanism of endogenous competition is described involving a positive externality of increasing returns to investment which are counterbalanced by recombinant innovation. We determine conditions under which lock-in can be avoided or escaped. A second extension is â€œsymmetry breakingâ€ of the system due to the introduction of an environmental policy that charges a price for polluting. A final extension adds a cost of environmental policy in the form of lower returns on investment implemented through a growth-depressing factor. We compare cumulative pollution under different scenarios, so that we can evaluate the combination of environmental regulation and recombinant innovation. [O] . Van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Zeppini Rossi P. 100

机译：用于环境创新的竞争重组技术：扩展亚瑟的锁定模型摘要：本文介绍了关于环境污染和清洁技术投资的连续决策模型，该模型扩展了亚瑟（1989）的路径依赖框架。这使我们能够评估是否以及如何解锁陷入肮脏技术的经济并转向清洁技术。主要的扩展涉及包括两种技术的重组创新的效果。内生竞争的机制被描述为涉及通过重组创新抵消的增加投资回报的正外部性。我们确定可以避免或转义锁定的条件。由于引入了污染价格的环境政策，第二个延伸是系统的“对称性破坏”。最后的延期增加了环境政策的成本，通过增长抑制因素实现了较低的投资回报。我们比较了不同情景下的累积污染，从而可以评估环境调控与重组创新的结合。

Grenoble-GIANT Territorial Innovation Models: Are investments in research infrastructures worthwhile?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅