...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >The Repertory Grid To Unfold Conflicting Positions: The Case Of A Stakeholder Dialogue On Prospects For Hydrogen
【24h】

The Repertory Grid To Unfold Conflicting Positions: The Case Of A Stakeholder Dialogue On Prospects For Hydrogen

机译：储备格网展现出矛盾的立场：关于氢的前景的利益相关者对话的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this article we share our experience with the application of the repertory grid method, and we demonstrate that this is an appropriate method to scrutinize complex issues and to structure stakeholder dialogues on these issues. Repertory grid originates from construct psychology and has gradually gained ground in other domains as well, such as policy analysis. We used repertory grid to articulate, stakeholders' conceptions of the prospects for hydrogen (H_2). The aim was to highlight not only the mainstream notions of hydrogen but also conceptions that gain less prominence in the hydrogen discourse. Repertory grid was applied in a computerized fashion, with twenty-four stakeholders. During the grid exercise, the stakeholders systematically compared ten different hydrogen visions, which led to a variety of characteristics ('constructs') that they used to distinguish and rank the visions. The data were analyzed by means of a frequency analysis and a HOMALS analysis. The analyses demonstrate that repertory grid has been an appropriate method to structure the hydrogen dialogue in three ways: (1) it elicited the full range of concepts that stakeholders used to evaluate hydrogen options; not only the mainstream options and conceptions but also those who are in the margins of the discourse, (2) it identified the most salient hydrogen visions to be explored further in the dialogue, and (3) it helped to form dialogue groups according to these visions. We have also seen that, although repertory grid is well able to prepare for a dialogue process, to make optimal use of the results of repertory grid a genuine deliberation about the marginal positions and conceptions needs to be ensured, even if the powerful actors (who adhere to the mainstream conceptions) are not in favor of this.
机译：在本文中，我们分享了使用库格式方法的经验，并且我们证明了这是一种检查复杂问题并组织有关这些问题的利益相关者对话的合适方法。储备格起源于建构心理学，并在其他领域也逐渐获得了发展，例如政策分析。我们使用了储备格来阐明利益相关者对氢（H_2）前景的构想。目的不仅是要突出氢的主流概念，而且要强调在氢话语中不太突出的概念。储备格以计算机化方式应用，有二十四个利益相关者。在电网演习中，利益相关者系统地比较了十种不同的氢愿景，从而得出了他们用来区分和排序愿景的各种特征（“构造”）。借助于频率分析和HOMALS分析来分析数据。分析表明，储库网格已经成为通过三种方式构建氢对话的适当方法：（1）提出了利益相关者用来评估氢选择方案的全部概念；不仅是主流选择和构想，而且还包括那些处于话语边缘的人们；（2）它确定了在对话中需要进一步探索的最重要的氢愿景；（3）根据这些观点，他们形成了对话小组愿景。我们还看到，尽管剧目网格能够很好地为对话过程做准备，但要充分利用剧目网格的结果，就必须确保对边际立场和概念进行真正的审议，即使有力的行动者（谁坚持主流观念）并不赞成这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号