India tops in cotton output, but China rules the market

首页> 外文期刊>Textile Asia >India tops in cotton output, but China rules the market

【24h】

India tops in cotton output, but China rules the market

机译：印度是棉花产量最高的国家，但中国主导市场

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Cotton farming worldwide is estimated to cover 33.5 million hectares in 2014-15. That is 3% increase over the previous season. India plays a significant role in this expansion. The country has remained consistently the home of the world's largest cotton acreage. Its planted area in 2014-15, estimated at 12.56 million hectares representing more than 50% increase than the average in the early 2000, is well over a third of the world total. Such expansion has compensated the low yield in the country, which is below world average, and helped India to overtake China as the world's top cotton producer last year. All indications suggest that India will retain the title this year and, maybe, beyond.

机译：据估计，2014-15年全球棉花种植面积为3350万公顷。比上一个赛季增加了3％。印度在这一扩张中发挥着重要作用。该国一直是世界上最大棉花种植地。 2014-15年度的播种面积估计为1,256万公顷，比2000年初的平均水平增加50％以上，远远超过世界总面积的三分之一。这种扩张弥补了该国低于世界平均水平的低产，并帮助印度去年超过中国成为世界最大的棉花生产国。种种迹象表明，印度将在今年甚至更长时间保持这一头衔。

著录项

来源
《Textile Asia》 |2015年第1期|7-8|共2页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Indian spinners enjoy good Chinese market for cotton yarn [J] . The Textile Magazine . 2013,第3期

机译：印度纱厂享受中国棉纱良好的市场
2. Action of China and India could affect cotton market [J] . Textile Asia . 2012,第3期

机译：中国和印度的行动可能影响棉花市场
3. Chinese and Indian policies dominate cotton markets [J] . Knitting international . 2012,第Jula期

机译：中国和印度的政策主导了棉花市场
4. India's Role in China's Cotton and Textile Market [C] . Xiaoxia Wang, rnHuili Shang, rnYuan Ling The Chinese and Global Cotton Industry: Long Term Development and Cooperation . 2008

机译：印度在中国棉花和纺织品市场中的作用
5. The Market Odyssey: Why and how was 'the market' discourse incorporated in the party program of the communist party of India (Marxist) during the days of the Communist Party of China's 'market socialism'?. [D] . Chakraborty, Indranil. 2011

机译：市场的奥德赛：为什么和如何在中国共产党的“市场社会主义”时代把这种“市场”话语纳入印度共产党（马克思主义）的党纲？
6. Transgenic Bt Cotton Does Not Disrupt the Top-Down Forces Regulating the Cotton Aphid in Central China [O] . Yong-Sheng Yao, Peng Han, Chang-Ying Niu, -1

机译：转基因Bt棉花不会破坏调节华中棉蚜的自上而下的作用力
7. We analyze, in this paper, a DSGE New Keynesian model with indi- visible labor where firms may belong to two different final goods producing sectors one where wages and employment are determined in competitive labor markets and the orther where wages and employment are the result of a contractual process between unions and firms. Bargaining between firms and monopoly unions implies real wage rigidity in the model and, in turn, an endogenous trade-off between output stabilization and infla- tion stabilization. We show that the negative effect of a productivity shock on inflation and the positive effect of a cost-push shock is crucially determined by the proportion of firms that belong to the competitive sec- tor. The larger is this number, the smaller are these effects. We derive a welfare based objective function as a second order Taylor approxima- tion of the expected utility of the economy's representative agent and we analyze optimal monetary policy. We show that the larger is the num- ber of firms that belong to the competitive sector, the smaller should be the response of the nominal interest rate to exogenous productivity and cost-push shocks. If we consider, however, an instrument rule where the interest rate must react to inflationary expectations, the rule is not af- fected by the structure of the labor market. The results of the model are consistent with a well known empirical regularity in macroeconomics, i.e. that employment volatility is larger than real wage volatility. [O] . Lorenza Rossi, Fabrizio Mattesini 100

机译：在本文中，我们分析了DsGE新凯恩斯主义模型，该模型具有明显的劳动力，其中企业可能属于两个不同的最终产品生产部门，其中工资和就业是在竞争性劳动力市场中确定的，而工资和就业是由工资和就业导致的。工会和公司之间的合同过程。企业和垄断联盟之间的讨价还价意味着模型中的实际工资刚性，反过来，产出稳定和通货膨胀稳定之间的内生权衡。我们表明，生产率冲击对通货膨胀的负面影响以及成本推动冲击的积极影响，主要取决于属于竞争部门的企业比例。这个数字越大，这些效果越小。我们得出一个基于福利的目标函数作为经济代理人的预期效用的二阶泰勒近似，我们分析最优货币政策。我们表明，属于竞争性行业的企业数量越大，名义利率对外生生产率和成本推动冲击的反应就越小。但是，如果我们考虑利率必须对通胀预期作出反应的工具规则，则该规则不受劳动力市场结构的影响。该模型的结果与宏观经济学中众所周知的经验规律一致，即就业波动率大于实际工资波动率。
8. Cotton: World Markets and Trade, July 2008. U.S. and India Dominate an Expanding Chinese Market [R] . 2008

机译：棉花：世界市场与贸易，2008年7月。美国和印度主导着扩大的中国市场

India tops in cotton output, but China rules the market

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅