...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The aviation consumer >Traffic Interfaces: TAS Still Beats ADS-B
【24h】

Traffic Interfaces: TAS Still Beats ADS-B

机译：交通接口：TAS仍胜过ADS-B

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Selecting a traffic alerter used to be easy. For lesser budgets, there were toss-it-on-the-glareshield portables (remember the Monroy?), while big-league active systems like the Goodrich Sky-watch TAS were for serious collision avoidance. The buying decision was muddied when Mode S datalink transponders came on the scene, and of course now there's FIS-B through ADS-B.If you still haven't upgraded to ADS-B, but your aircraft has an existing traffic alerter (TAS or TIS-A) you could be faced with some confusing buying and interfacingdecisions should you include ADS-B traffic in the mix. With a multitude of traffic sources, how might you logically display them so interpreting the data doesn't cause confusion and worse, a midair?
机译：选择交通警报器过去很容易。对于较少的预算，可以将其扔在防眩的便携式设备上（还记得梦露吗？），而像Goodrich Sky-watch TAS这样的大型同盟主动系统则是为了避免碰撞。当模式S数据链路应答器出现时，购买决定变得模糊不清，当然现在还有通过ADS-B的FIS-B。如果您还没有升级到ADS-B，但是您的飞机上已有交通警报器（TAS）或TIS-A），如果您在组合中包含ADS-B流量，则可能会遇到一些令人困惑的购买和接口决策。在流量来源众多的情况下，您应该如何在逻辑上显示它们，以至于解释数据不会造成混乱甚至更糟？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号