...
首页> 外文期刊>The aviation consumer >OLD SCHOOL COOLING DOESN'T GET IT DONE
【24h】

OLD SCHOOL COOLING DOESN'T GET IT DONE

机译:老派的散热无法完成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Back in the day, aircraft manufactures had the smart idea of using outside ram air to pump cooling air into the radio stack. The ram air is captured through an outside vent often placed on the leading edge of a wing. While the idea was grand, it was far from efficient and can be damaging to modern gear. Avionics manufacturers now frown on the design, and for good reasons. First, when flying through heavy rain, the potential for inducing water into the scat hoses is a major concern. We've seen our share of radio cases coated with corrosion and ugly green crust due to water ingestion. And damage aside, it's hardly effective cooling. Outside ram cooling is useless when the aircraft is stationary, like when you're sitting in a baking run-up area waiting for clearance on a 90-degree day.
机译:过去,飞机制造商有一个聪明的主意,即使用外部冲压空气将冷却空气泵入无线电堆栈。冲压空气通过通常置于机翼前缘的外部通风孔捕获。虽然这个想法很宏大,但它远非高效,并且可能会损害现代设备。航空电子制造商现在对此设计不满意,这是有充分理由的。首先,在大雨中飞行时,引水进入喷头软管的潜力是一个主要问题。我们已经看到,由于水的摄入,无线电箱中涂有腐蚀和难看的绿色硬皮。除了损坏,几乎没有有效的冷却方法。当飞机静止不动时,例如当您坐在烘烤准备区等待90度通风时,外部撞锤冷却是没有用的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The aviation consumer》 |2011年第3期|p.18|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号