...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Water Law >DAMMING THE INDUS WATERS: THOUGHTS ON THE FUTURE OF THE 1960 INDUS WATERS TREATY AND HIMALAYAN WATER SECURITY
【24h】

DAMMING THE INDUS WATERS: THOUGHTS ON THE FUTURE OF THE 1960 INDUS WATERS TREATY AND HIMALAYAN WATER SECURITY

机译：渔业水域渔业水域：关于1960年的伊斯文水域条约和喜马拉雅水安全的未来的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Water treaties are instrumental in resolving transboundary water-related conflicts. However, structural and operational shortcomings can make them ineffective in dealing with future challenges. This article analyses the i960 Indus W aters Treaty (IWT) between India and Pakistan. Over the years, questions have been raised concerning its scope, particularly regarding its lack of adequate stakeholder participation and provisions on environmental protections, issues which are now exacerbated by the proliferation of Indian dam projects that have led to disputes between India and Pakistan. This article evaluates the framework and weaknesses of the Indus Waters Treaty, particularly in terms of its scope (ratione materiae and ratione personae). Namely, (ⅰ) the absence of specific rules within the IWT to tackle emergent environmental concerns brought about by Indian dam projects on the Western Rivers in Indian Administered Kashmir (such as the Baglihar and Kishenganga dams) and (ⅱ) non-participation of relevant state (China) and non-state (Kashmiri people) stakeholders. The article will also appraise to what extent interpretations provided in the Baglihar Decision/ Kishenganga Awards as well as international water law jurisprudence have closed some of the identified gaps in the treaty. Finally, some recommendations for the path towards 'outcome cooperation' and sustainable water development in the region will be provided.
机译：水条约是解决跨界水有关的冲突的工具。然而，结构和运营缺点可以使它们无效地处理未来的挑战。本文分析了印度和巴基斯坦之间的I960 Indus Waters条约（IWT）。多年来，问题已经提出有关其范围，尤其是关于其缺乏足够的利益相关者参与和环境保护，这是现在已导致印度和巴基斯坦之间的纠纷印度水坝项目的扩散加剧了问题的规定。本文评估了印度水域条约的框架和缺点，特别是在其范围（Ratione Materiae和Ratione Personae）方面。即（Ⅰ）在IWT内没有具体规则，以印度管理的克什米尔（如Baglihar和Kishenganga Dams）的西部河流（如Baglihar和Kishenganga Dams）和（Ⅱ）不参与相关的印度大坝项目所带来的紧急环境问题国家（中国）和非国家（克什米尔人）利益攸关方。本文还将评估巴格尔尔决定/基希亨加奖和国际水法法学院的解释在多大程度上涉及该条约的一些已识别的差距。最后，将提供对该地区的“成果合作”和可持续水开发的途径的一些建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Journal of Water Law》 |2018年第6期|207-222|共16页
  • 作者

    FOZIA NAZIR LONE;

  • 作者单位

    School of Law City University of Hong Kong;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号