...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Pacific Review >ASEAN and regional governance after the Cold War: from regional order to regional community?
【24h】

ASEAN and regional governance after the Cold War: from regional order to regional community?

机译：冷战后的东盟与区域治理：从区域秩序到区域共同体？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper first reviews and critiques the dominant realist and constructivist accounts of ASEAN, which have enjoyed much prominence in The Pacific Review since the journal's founding in 1988. ASEAN behaviour and outcomes cannot be fitted into neat theoretical categories that emphasize either material or ideational variables in explanation. Instead, ASEAN displays complexities in behaviour that are the product of the contingent interaction between the material (power, territory, wealth) and the ideational (norms, ideas, identity) as member states actively seek to manage domestic order as well as regional order within and beyond ASEAN. In all of this, state interests and identities remain paramount, which means that the long-standing ASEAN norms of sovereigntyon-interference remain central to regional governance. Under these conditions, and despite the Charter's newly articulated political norms of democratization, human rights, and the rule of law, the prospects seem doubtful for building a people-centred ASEAN Community in which regional governance displays inclusiveness, seeking to address the interests and needs of the region's ordinary people as opposed to what its elites deem appropriate. The final portion of the paper explores what a critical approach to studying ASEAN might reveal. In particular, the paper attempts to identify whether there may be any political spaces opening up within existing structures and practices from which progressive change could emerge, even if slowly, particularly in the area of human rights and social justice, key elements in building an inclusive, ASEAN Community.
机译：本文首先回顾并批判了东盟占主导地位的现实主义和建构主义观点，自从该期刊于1988年成立以来，该观点在《太平洋评论》中就享有很高的知名度。说明。相反，东盟表现出行为上的复杂性，这是物质（权力，领土，财富）与概念性（规范，观念，身份）之间不断的相互作用的产物，因为成员国积极寻求在国内管理国内秩序以及区域秩序以及东盟以外的国家在所有这些方面，国家利益和身份仍然是最重要的，这意味着长期存在的东盟主权/不干涉规范仍然是区域治理的核心。在这种情况下，尽管《宪章》新阐明了民主化，人权和法治的政治规范，但对于建立一个以人为中心的东盟共同体，其区域治理表现出包容性，寻求解决利益和需求的前景似乎存有疑问。与该地区精英认为适当的情况相反。本文的最后一部分探讨了研究东盟的关键方法可能揭示的内容。特别是，本文试图确定在现有结构和实践中是否可能存在任何政治空间，从中可以出现渐进式变革，即使进展缓慢，尤其是在人权和社会正义领域，这也是建立包容性的关键要素，东盟共同体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号