• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The police chief >What Potential Sanctions Trigger Garrity Protection?
【24h】

What Potential Sanctions Trigger Garrity Protection?

机译：哪些潜在制裁会触发节俭保护？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is not unusual, during an internal affairs investigation, for an officer (or the officer's attorney), when asked a question to which the answer might be incriminating, to inquire, "What is the penalty if I refuse to answer?" Before replying to this query, a chief may want to consult the local district attorney's office (so as not to impede a criminal prosecution) as well as the department's legal advisor (where union issues or civil liability implications are involved). Courts routinely hold that a government employer may not compel an employee to appear and testify and may not induce him or her to forgo the Fifth Amendment privilege by threatening to impose economic or other sanctions that are "capable of forcing the self-incrimination which the Amendment forbids."
机译：在内部事务调查中，某官员（或该官员的律师）在被问到答案可能带有针对性的问题时询问：“如果我拒绝回答，将受到什么处罚？”在回答此问题之前，局长可能要咨询当地的地方检察官办公室（以免妨碍刑事诉讼）以及部门的法律顾问（涉及工会问题或涉及民事责任的问题）。法院通常认为，政府雇主不得通过威胁施加经济制裁或其他能够“强迫雇员自诉”的经济制裁，而不得强迫雇员出庭作证，也不得诱使他或她放弃第五修正案特权。禁止修改。“

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号