• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The RUSI journal >Life-line Lost: The Rise And Fall Of 'neutral' Sweden's Secret Reserve Option Of Wartime Help From The West
【24h】

Life-line Lost: The Rise And Fall Of 'neutral' Sweden's Secret Reserve Option Of Wartime Help From The West

机译：失去生命线：“西方”战时援助的“中立”瑞典秘密储备方案的兴衰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This well-written and carefully researched account is based on Dr Dalsjo's doctoral thesis. It asks what would have happened in the Cold War had Swedish neutrality failed and the Soviet Union had attacked Sweden. The public response given by Swedish governments over the years rarely specified a particular attacker in case of war and placed an emphasis on Sweden's preparedness to defend itself. The questions then arose as to what would happen after Sweden could no longer hold back an invader. Would it depend on others - most notably the NATO countries - to come to its assistance and, if so, what arrangement might be made in peacetime for such an eventuality? Would not any such agreements with alliance members in peacetime undermine Swedish neutrality? Were they a necessary 'reserve option' that had to be cloaked with secrecy? How long did such connections endure? The original post-war notion of a neutrality based on holding out against an attack until help from outside arrived was eventually replaced by the doctrine of marginality, whereby a well-armed Sweden would be able to repulse any marginal forces that NATO or Warsaw Pact would have available to use against Sweden. This change increased the political price of any links to the West being found out and also enhanced the feeling of disjointedness by those officials expected to maintain this co-operation. As a result, the links fell fallow as key personnel retired or moved, with instructions not being passed on to successors.
机译：这个精心编写且经过仔细研究的说明是基于Dalsjo博士的博士论文。它询问如果瑞典的中立失败和苏联袭击瑞典，在冷战中会发生什么。多年来，瑞典政府的公开回应很少指出发生战争的特定攻击者，并强调瑞典为自卫做好准备。随之而来的问题是，在瑞典不再阻止入侵者之后会发生什么。它会依靠其他国家，尤其是北约国家来提供援助吗？如果是的话，和平时期可以为这种情况做出什么样的安排？和平时期与联盟成员达成的任何此类协议是否会破坏瑞典的中立性？它们是必须保密的必要的“保留选项”吗？这样的连接要持续多久？战后最初的中立理念是坚持抵制进攻直到外部的帮助到来，最终被边际主义所取代，装备精良的瑞典将能够击退北约或华沙条约组织将要击败的边际力量可用于对付瑞典。这种变化增加了人们发现与西方的任何联系的政治代价，也加剧了那些希望维持这种合作的官员的脱节感。结果，当关键人员退休或搬迁时，这些链接就休假了，指示没有传递给后继者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The RUSI journal》 |2009年第1期|p.104-105|共2页
  • 作者

    Clive Archer;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号