• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The RUSI journal >The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire A History of the 'Blue Book'
【24h】

The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire A History of the 'Blue Book'

机译：奥斯曼帝国对亚美尼亚人的待遇“蓝皮书”的历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Blue Book arose from a coincidence of humanitarian and political interests in publicizing strong evidence that the existence of an entire nation was under threat by an enemy power. Unlike most forms of propaganda, it does not seek to interpret or select the events it records, only to display them as they occurred, and over as wide a field as possible. The Blue Book speaks for itself. The force of the evidence is cumulative and its value cannot be estimated without reading the testimony as a whole. The fact that it was used as propaganda does not invalidate this evidence. The unique character of the Blue Book also reflects the fact that those responsible for producing it had somewhat differing agendas (Bryce the statesman and publicist and Toynbee the professional historian). But neither has ever been accused of intellectual or moral dishonesty. The Blue Book is not disinformation.
机译：蓝皮书源于人道主义和政治利益的巧合，它公开了强有力的证据表明整个国家的存在正受到敌人力量的威胁。与大多数形式的宣传不同，它不试图解释或选择记录的事件，仅在事件发生时显示它们，并在尽可能宽的范围内显示。蓝皮书不言自明。证据的力量是累积性的，不阅读整个证词就无法估计其价值。用作宣传的事实并不会使这一证据无效。蓝皮书的独特性还反映了一个事实，即负责制作蓝皮书的人的议程有所不同（布莱斯政治家和公关家以及专业历史学家汤因比）。但是，没有人被指控在思想上或道德上不诚实。蓝皮书不是虚假信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号