...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Decision >We-thinking and vacillation between frames: filling a gap in Bacharach's theory
【24h】

We-thinking and vacillation between frames: filling a gap in Bacharach's theory

机译：我们在框架之间的思考与动摇：填补了巴哈拉赫理论的空白

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We-thinking theories allow groups to deliberate as agents. They have been introduced into the economic domain for both theoretical and empirical reasons. Among the few scholars who have proposed formal approaches to illustrate how we-thinking arises, Bacharach offers one of the most developed theories from the game theoretic point of view. He presents a number of intuitions, not always mutually consistent and not fully developed. In this article, I propose a way to complete Bacharach's theory, generalizing the interdependence hypothesis and building on his intuition about vacillation. It is a simple model of vacillation between the I and we-modes of reasoning, as a way in which we-thinking can come to mind in the face of a decision problem. The vacillation model makes we-reasoning more easily usable in game theory.
机译：我们的理论允许团体作为代理人进行审议。由于理论和经验原因，它们已被引入经济领域。在为提出我们的思维方式而提出正式方法的少数学者中，Bacharach提供了从博弈论的角度出发最发达的理论之一。他提出了许多直觉，但并不总是相互一致的，也没有得到充分发展。在本文中，我提出了一种完善巴哈拉赫理论的方法，它概括了相互依存的假设并建立在他对波动的直觉上。它是I和我们推理模式之间波动的简单模型，可以作为面对决策问题时我们思考的一种方式。波动模型使我们的推理在博弈论中更容易使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号