...
首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Decision >Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences: an experimental study
【24h】

Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences: an experimental study

机译:道德判断,性别和反社会偏好:一项实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We study questionnaire responses to situations in which sacrificing one life may save many other lives. We demonstrate gender differences in moral judgments: males are more supportive of the sacrifice than females. We investigate a source of the endorsement of the sacrifice: antisocial preferences. First, we measure individual proneness to spiteful behavior, using an experimental game with monetary stakes. We demonstrate that spitefulness can be sizable-a fifth of our participants behave spitefully-but it is not associated with gender. Second, we find that gender is consistently associated with responses even when we account for individual differences in the propensity to spitefulness.
机译:我们研究了问卷调查对牺牲一种生命可能挽救许多其他生命的情况的回答。我们在道德判断中表现出性别差异:男性比女性更支持牺牲。我们调查了背书的来源:反社会偏好。首先,我们使用带有金钱赌注的实验性游戏来衡量个人是否有恶意行为。我们证明了恶意是相当大的-我们的参与者有五分之一的行为是恶意的-但它与性别无关。其次,我们发现,即使我们考虑了恶意倾向的个体差异,性别也始终与回应相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号