...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >Plain packaging: legislative differences in Australia, France, the UK, New Zealand and Norway, and options for strengthening regulations
【24h】

Plain packaging: legislative differences in Australia, France, the UK, New Zealand and Norway, and options for strengthening regulations

机译：普通包装：澳大利亚，法国，英国，新西兰和挪威的立法差异以及加强法规的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

By July 2018, five countries (Australia, France, the UK, New Zealand and Norway) had fully implemented plain (standardised) packaging. Using government documents, we reviewed the key legislative differences between these five countries to identify best practice measures and potential lacuna. We then discuss how governments planning to introduce plain packaging could strengthen their legislation. Differences between countries include the terminology used (either 'plain', 'standardised' or 'plain and standardised'), products covered and transition times (ranging from 2 to 12 months). Myriad differences exist with respect to the packaging, including the dimensions (explicitly stated for height, width and depth vs minimum dimensions for the health warnings only), structure (straight-edged flip-top packs vs straight, rounded and bevelled-edged flip-top packs and shoulder boxes) and size (minimum number of cigarettes and weight of tobacco vs fixed amounts) and warning content (eg, inclusion of a stop-smoking web address and/or quitline displayed on warnings on one or both principal display areas). Future options that merit further analysis include banning colour descriptors in brand and variant names, allowing pack inserts promoting cessation and permitting cigarettes that are designed to be dissuasive. Plain packaging legislation and regulations are divergent. Countries moving towards plain packaging should consider incorporating the strengths of existing policies and review opportunities for extending these. While plain packaging represents a milestone in tobacco-control policy, future legislation need not simply reflect the past but could set new benchmarks to maximise the potential benefits of this policy.
机译：到2018年7月，五个国家（澳大利亚，法国，英国，新西兰和挪威）已经完全实施了平原（标准化）包装。使用政府文件，我们审查了这五个国家之间的关键立法差异，以确定最佳实践措施和潜在的空格。然后，我们讨论政府计划如何引进普通包装可以加强其立法。各国之间的差异包括所使用的术语（“平原”，“标准化”或“平原”，产品覆盖和过渡时间（从2到12个月的范围）。无数差异存在于包装上的差异，包括尺寸（仅限高度，宽度和深度，仅用于健康警告的最小尺寸），结构（直边翻转包装与直线，圆形和倾斜的边缘的尺寸顶部包装和肩箱）和尺寸（烟草的卷烟数量和烟草的重量）和警告内容（例如，包括在一个或两个主体显示区域的警告上显示的停止吸烟的Web地址和/或Quitline） 。优异进一步分析的未来选项包括禁止品牌和变体名称中的颜色描述符，允许包装促进戒烟和允许批准的香烟。普通包装立法和法规是不同的。走向普通包装的国家应考虑纳入现有政策的优势，并审查扩大这些政策的机会。虽然平面包装代表烟草控制政策中的里程碑，但未来的立法不需要简单地反映过去，但可以设置新的基准，以最大限度地提高本政策的潜在利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号