...
首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >Association of initial e-cigarette and other tobacco product use with subsequent cigarette smoking in adolescents: a cross-sectional matched control study
【24h】

Association of initial e-cigarette and other tobacco product use with subsequent cigarette smoking in adolescents: a cross-sectional matched control study

机译:初始电子烟和其他烟草产品的协会与青少年的后续香烟吸烟:横截面匹配对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IntroductionThis study assessed whether initiating e-cigarette use increases the uptake of cigarette smoking in US adolescents compared with behavioural and synthetic controls.MethodsData come from 78 265 adolescents in the National Youth Tobacco Survey (2014-2017) of whom 38 630 provided information about the first tobacco product they had used in 2014/15. Ever, past 30 day and established (30 day use and 100+ lifetime cigarettes) cigarette smoking was compared in adolescents who first used an e-cigarette (exposure group), a non-cigarette combustible (CT) or other non-combustible tobacco (NT) product (behavioural controls), and propensity score matched adolescents without initial e-cigarette use (synthetic controls).ResultsRelative to behavioural controls, adolescents who tried e-cigarettes first were less likely to have ever smoked cigarettes (26% vs CT (42.4%; OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.57), or NT initiators (52.7%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.39)), to be past 30 day (6% vs CT (11.9%; OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.62), or NT initiators (20.0%; OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.35)) or be established cigarette smokers (0.7% vs CT (3.9%; OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.30), or NT initiators (8.4%; OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.13)). E-cigarette initiators were also less likely than synthetic controls (without initial e-cigarette use) to have ever smoked cigarettes (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.93), be past 30 day (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.91) or be established cigarette smokers (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.51).ConclusionLess than 1% of US adolescents who use e-cigarettes first were established cigarette smokers. They were less likely to be smokers than adolescents who tried other combustible or non-combustible tobacco products first and propensity score matched adolescents without initial e-cigarette use.
机译:引言研究评估了启动电子烟机是否增加了美国青少年吸烟的吸烟,与行为和合成控制相比。方法来自国家青年烟草调查(2014-2017)的78个265名青少年,其中38 630个提供了有关的信息他们在2014/15年使用的第一个烟草产品。在第一次使用电子烟(暴露组),非卷烟可燃(CT)或其他不可燃烧的烟草中,过去30天和建立(30天使用和100岁)的香烟吸烟进行了比较香烟吸烟( NT)产品(行为控制)和倾向得分匹配的青少年没有初始电子烟机的使用(合成控制)。努力对行为控制的影响,试过电子烟的青少年不太可能吸烟(26%VS CT( 42.4%;或0.48,95%CI 0.40至0.57),或NT引发剂(52.7%;或0.32,95%CI 0.26至0.39)),过去30天(6%VS CT(11.9%;或0.48, 95%CI 0.36至0.62),或NT引发剂(20.0%;或0.26,95%CI 0.19至0.35))或成立香烟吸烟者(0.7%VS CT(3.9%;或0.17,95%CI 0.10至0.10)或NT引发剂(8.4%;或0.08,95%CI 0.04至0.13))。 E-卷烟引发剂也不太可能比合成控制(没有初始电子烟)烟卷烟(或0.76,95%CI 0.62至0.93),超过30天(或0.71,95%CI 0.55至0.91 )或被成立的香烟吸烟者(或0.26,95%CI 0.13至0.51)。不超过1%的美国青少年使用电子烟首先建立香烟吸烟者。它们不太可能是吸烟者,而不是尝试其他可燃或不可燃烧烟草制品的青少年和倾向得分匹配的青少年没有初始电子卷烟。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号