...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy >Institutional patterns of enterprise architecture adoption in government
【24h】

Institutional patterns of enterprise architecture adoption in government

机译：政府采用企业架构的机构模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand why, and under which circumstances, enterprise architecture (EA) planning adoption improves information systems (IS) planning and supports administrative transformation in government. Design/methodology/approach – About 12 cases in the USA were approached with a preliminary theoretical framework derived from the extant literature. Theory building had affinities with grounded-theory approaches and came out of numerous iterations between the “deep cases” and the extant theory. Findings – Three adoption patterns illustrate that the adoption of a new IS planning innovation does not create administrative or political transformation in itself. Compliance and imitation primarily drives the adoption process, while fundamental transformation to the tasks performed in government is only achieved if the institutional force at the micro-and macro-level promotes transformation. Research limitations/implications – The neoinstitutional perspective proposed can be of value to other IS researchers as a basis for empirical work in other situations; the implications of the case study can be taken as starting point for further research into the important topic of IS-based administrative transformation. Practical implications – The research illustrate that EA adoption is an emergent, evolving, embedded, fragmented, and provisional social production that is shaped as much by cultural and structural forces in the organizational context in which they are implemented as rational technical and economic ones. The findings helps public organizations better understand and manage the adoption of new IS planning innovations. Originality/value – In the IS literature, very few have recognized the contribution of “new” institutional theory. Thus, this paper helps us understand how administrative and political transformation is adopted in government from a new perspective.
机译：目的–本文的目的是了解为什么采用企业体系结构（EA）计划可以改善信息系统（IS）计划并支持政府的行政转型，以及在何种情况下采用。设计/方法/方法–在美国，大约有12个案例采用了来自现有文献的初步理论框架。理论构建与扎根的理论方法具有相似性，并且源于“深层案例”与现存理论之间的多次迭代。调查结果–三种采用模式表明，采用新的信息系统规划创新本身不会带来行政或政治变革。遵从和模仿主要是推动采用过程，而只有在微观和宏观层面的机构力量促进变革的情况下，才能对政府执行的任务进行根本性的转变。研究的局限性/意义–提出的新制度视角对于其他IS研究者可能是有价值的，作为在其他情况下进行实证研究的基础；案例研究的意义可以作为进一步研究基于IS的行政转型的重要课题的起点。实际意义–研究表明，采用EA是一种新兴的，不断发展的，嵌入的，零散的和临时的社会生产，它在组织环境中作为合理的技术和经济手段而受到文化和结构力量的影响。调查结果有助于公共组织更好地理解和管理采用新的IS计划创新的方式。原创性/价值–在IS文献中，很少有人意识到“新”制度理论的贡献。因此，本文有助于我们从新的角度理解政府如何进行行政和政治转型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号