...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transnational environmental law >The Impacts and Implications of CERCLA on the Soil Environmental Conservation Act of the Republic of Korea
【24h】

The Impacts and Implications of CERCLA on the Soil Environmental Conservation Act of the Republic of Korea

机译：CERCLA对大韩民国土壤环境保护法的影响和启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article explores the development and enforcement of the Republic of Korea's Soil Environmental Conservation Act (SECA). It argues that, although Korea has adopted the statutory model of the United States (US) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and US case law, it has formulated SECA to devise a Korean model of an effective and reasonable liability scheme based on the Korean regulatory context. The original SECA, especially its retroactive liability provision, was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court of Korea, because it violated the principle of legitimate expectations protection'. Since then, SECA has been amended to include more diverse categories of polluter and to provide more adequate defences. The development process of this Korean model can be instructive for less developed countries that urgently need to address soil pollution but are not yet equipped with the necessary environmental statutes and regulatory infrastructure and, thus, are vulnerable to environmental risks.
机译：本文探讨了大韩民国土壤环境保护法（SECA）的制定和执行。它辩称，尽管韩国采用了美国（US）《综合环境响应，赔偿和责任法》（CERCLA）和美国判例法的法定模式，但它制定了SECA来设计一种有效且合理的责任韩国模式。基于韩国监管环境的计划。 SECA最初的规定，特别是其追溯责任条款，被韩国宪法法院宣布为违宪，因为它违反了合法期望保护的原则。从那时起，SECA已被修改，以包括更多种类的污染者，并提供更充分的防御。这种韩国模式的发展过程对急需解决土壤污染但尚未配备必要的环境法规和监管基础设施，因此易受环境风险影响的欠发达国家具有指导意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号