...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transnational environmental law >What Difference Does CBDR Make? A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Role of Differentiation in the Transnational Legal Process for REDD
【24h】

What Difference Does CBDR Make? A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Role of Differentiation in the Transnational Legal Process for REDD

机译：CBDR有什么不同？差异在REDD跨国法律程序中的作用的社会法律分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article offers a socio-legal analysis of the role played by the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) in the development, diffusion, and implementation of jurisdictional REDD+ activities throughout the developing world. It employs a qualitative research method known as process tracing to uncover whether and, if so, to what extent and how actors have used CBDR to support the emergence and effectiveness of the transnational legal process for REDD+. The article argues that the transnational legal process for REDD+ reflects a conception of CBDR in which developing country governments may take on voluntary commitments to reduce their carbon emissions, with the multilateral, bilateral, and private sources of financial support and technical assistance provided by developed countries, international organizations, non-governmental organizations, and corporations. This creative conception and application of CBDR has fostered the construction and diffusion of legal norms for REDD+ because it has influenced the interests, ideas, and identities of public and private actors in the North and South. However, the early challenges associated with the implementation of REDD+ reveal a worrying gap between the financial pledges made by developed countries and the costs associated with the full implementation of REDD+, as well as contradictions in the very way in which the responsibilities of various countries have been defined in the context of REDD+. The analysis has important implications for the transnational governance of REDD+, as well as for scholarship on the role of differentiation in the pursuit of effective and equitable climate change solutions.
机译：本文提供了社会法律分析，说明了共同但有区别的责任原则（CBDR）在整个发展中世界的管辖区REDD +活动的开发，传播和实施中所扮演的角色。它采用一种称为过程跟踪的定性研究方法来揭示行为者是否以及在何种程度上以及如何使用CBDR来支持REDD +跨国法律程序的出现和有效性。文章认为，针对REDD +的跨国法律程序反映了“共同但有区别的责任”的概念，在这种概念中，发展中国家政府可以通过发达国家提供的多边，双边和私人资金支持和技术援助来自愿承诺减少其碳排放。 ，国际组织，非政府组织和公司。 CBDR的这种创新概念和应用促进了REDD +法律规范的构建和传播，因为它影响了北方和南方公私行为者的利益，思想和身份。但是，与实施REDD +相关的早期挑战表明，发达国家所作的财政承诺与全面实施REDD +相关的费用之间存在令人担忧的差距，而且各国的责任也存在矛盾在REDD +中定义。该分析对REDD +的跨国治理以及有关差异化在寻求有效，公平的气候变化解决方案方面的作用的学术研究具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号