首页> 外文期刊>Transport Engineering in Australia >Forensic aspects of in-vehicle data collection
【24h】

Forensic aspects of in-vehicle data collection

机译:车载数据收集的法医方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the early 1990s, vehicle manufacturers have been developing internal computer networks for cars and trucks. Computers now control (or are able to control): the engine ignition, vehicular emissions, throttle operation, automatic transmission operation, the prevention of brakes locking, the prevention of drive wheels spinning, the minimisation of sideways sliding, the timing and deployment of airbags, and many other functions. Sometimes included on this linked network of computers is the "Event Data Recorder" (EDR). Some makes of vehicles can record certain variables associated with the last 5 s of driving prior to an airbag being deployed. In 2004/2005, the American Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) developed a new Standard (IEEE 1616 - a voluntary standard) that suggests that EDRs by 2008 collect up to 8 s of data prior to a crash occurring. The Standard also suggests that the computer network from which the data is collected possess some degree of "crashworthiness" - a characteristic that is currently not required. There has been extensive research on the reliability of pre-crash data using this technology. For example, comparing on-board EDR data with crash sled test data, comparing them with data from staged collisions, and finally, with output from forensically investigated "real world" crashes. The consensus from that research is that the EDR data are "mostly" correct - but are not necessarily so. The research emphasises that if such data are to be used for law enforcement purposes, a full forensic investigation be undertaken first - collecting friction measurements, skid mark lengths, crush damage and so on. After calculations are produced using these "manual" processes, then the EDR data can be downloaded and interrogated. The primary purpose of such a methodology is to ensure that any results of the crash analysis obey fundamental laws of Newtonian physics. The consensus of the research is that downloading the data first then undertaking the (more subjective) forensic analysis would bias any subsequent investigation.
机译:自1990年代初以来,汽车制造商一直在开发用于汽车和卡车的内部计算机网络。现在,计算机可以控制(或能够控制):发动机点火,车辆废气排放,节气门操作,自动变速箱操作,防止制动器锁定,防止驱动轮旋转,最小化侧向滑动,安全气囊的定时和展开,以及许多其他功能。有时在此链接的计算机网络中包含“事件数据记录器”(EDR)。某些品牌的汽车可以记录与安全气囊展开前最后5 s行驶相关的某些变量。在2004/2005年,美国电气和电子工程师协会(IEEE)开发了新标准(IEEE 1616-自愿性标准),该标准建议EDR到2008年在发生崩溃之前最多收集8 s的数据。该标准还建议从中收集数据的计算机网络具有一定程度的“耐崩溃性”-目前不需要这种特性。使用此技术对崩溃前数据的可靠性进行了广泛的研究。例如,将车载EDR数据与碰撞橇测试数据进行比较,将其与阶段性碰撞数据进行比较,最后将其与经过法医研究的“真实世界”碰撞的输出进行比较。该研究的共识是,EDR数据“大部分”正确-但不一定如此。该研究强调,如果将此类数据用于执法目的,则首先要进行全面的法证研究-收集摩擦测量值,滑​​痕长度,挤压损坏等。使用这些“手动”过程进行计算后,便可以下载和查询EDR数据。这种方法的主要目的是确保碰撞分析的任何结果都遵循牛顿物理学的基本定律。该研究的共识是,先下载数据然后再进行(比较主观的)取证分析将对以后的任何调查产生偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号