• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Of Cyberliberation and Forbidden Fornication: Hidden Transcripts of Autonomous Mobility in Finland
【24h】

Of Cyberliberation and Forbidden Fornication: Hidden Transcripts of Autonomous Mobility in Finland

机译：网络解放与禁止通奸：芬兰自主流动的隐藏抄本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While autonomous mobility technology is developing, comparatively less is known about how a sociotechnical system of autonomous mobility may impact our urban living conditions. Using Finland as a case study, this research aims to identify the possible implications of changing power relations created by autonomous mobility technology. This study uses a theoretical and conceptual approach grounded in the planning research tradition of Aristotelian practical judgement (phronesis). Drawing from political theory of technology, it investigates the social relations that may be afforded by autonomous mobility technology. Adapting a concept drawn from geography of power, it examines how power is expressed in terms of transcripts of dominant technological agency and hidden social context. 31 interviews of extended users in the transition (intermediaries) revealed three dominant transcripts of technological agency associated with the philosophy of cyberlibertarianism (liberation of the driver, safety of the driver and customer accessibility), and four hidden transcripts of social context (restrictions on sharing street space, loss of social safety, vulnerability of passengers, and loss of privacy). The phronetic research tradition that was used in the study revealed several things. The impact of autonomous mobility technology goes beyond the purely systemic, affecting the very fabric of our connection with place and society. Failure to consider autonomous mobility technology as a sociotechnical system that will restructure society unperceptively (technological somnambulism) may bring profound societal changes.
机译：随着自动驾驶技术的发展，人们对自动驾驶的社会技术系统如何影响我们的城市生活条件的了解相对较少。这项研究以芬兰为例，旨在确定由自动驾驶技术产生的权力关系变化带来的潜在影响。本研究使用基于亚里士多德实践判断（通称）的规划研究传统的理论和概念方法。它从技术的政治理论出发，研究了自动出行技术可能提供的社会关系。它采用了从权力地理学中汲取的概念，研究了如何通过占主导地位的技术代理和隐藏的社会背景的笔录来表达权力。对过渡时期的扩展用户（中介机构）进行的31次访谈揭示了与网络自由主义哲学相关的三个技术代理主导成绩单（驾驶员的解放，驾驶员的安全性和客户可及性），以及社交环境的四个隐藏的成绩单（共享限制）街道空间，社会安全的丧失，乘客的脆弱性和隐私权的丧失）。研究中使用的通俗的研究传统揭示了几件事。自主交通技术的影响不仅限于系统性的，还影响了我们与地方和社会之间联系的结构。如果不将自动驾驶技术视为一种社会技术系统，它将不知不觉地重组社会（技术游说），可能会带来深刻的社会变革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号