• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >30 Years of soft interventions to reduce car use - A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

30 Years of soft interventions to reduce car use - A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译：30年软化干预措施，减少汽车使用 - 系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Soft travel interventions are generally regarded as effective measures for reducing personal car use. However, doubts about the validity of such claims are raised, primarily fueled by the low methodological quality of evaluation studies upon which such conclusions are based and by the fact that the literature is, for the most part, narratively synthesized. The present systematic review addresses these critiques by investigating the effect of soft interventions on car use through a meta-analysis, which includes only experimental and well-controlled quasi-experimental studies. Results revealed that interventions (k = 41) lead to a significant reduction of 7% in car modal split share (Hedges' g = 0.163). Moderators of interventions' effectiveness were investigated in a meta-regression. Effectiveness was moderated by the type of intervention and by the main psychological variable targeted by the interventions, whereas the other studied moderators (i.e. residential relocation of participants, study design, percentage of females in the study, the presence of incentives, passed time to follow-up, interventions' measurement instrument, city size in which interventions were applied and the setting where they were conducted) were non-significant. Limitations of the present findings, together with implications for policy and practice are discussed.
机译：软旅行干预措施通常被认为是减少个人汽车使用的有效措施。然而，对这些权利要求的有效性的怀疑是提出的，主要通过评价研究的低方法论质量来推动，在这些结论是基础的，并且由于文献是大部分，叙事合成的事实​​。目前的系统评价通过研究通过META分析研究软化干预措施对汽车使用的影响来解决这些批评，该研究仅包括实验性和受控的准实验研究。结果表明，干预措施（k = 41）导致汽车模式分裂份额的显着减少7％（羽h G = 0.163）。在荟萃回归中调查了干预措施的主持人。干预类型和由干预措施所针对的主要心理变量的有效性，而另一个研究的主持人（即，参与者的住宅搬迁，研究设计，研究中的女性百分比，激励措施的存在，通过时间来遵循-UP，干预措施的测量仪，施工干预的城市规模以及对其进行的环境）是非显着的。讨论了本结果的局限性，以及对政策和实践的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号