...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >'They have to be better than human drivers!' Motorcyclists' and cyclists' perceptions of autonomous vehicles
【24h】

'They have to be better than human drivers!' Motorcyclists' and cyclists' perceptions of autonomous vehicles

机译：“他们必须比人类司机更好！” 摩托车手的自动车辆的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Road users and the general population by and large recognise the value of vehicles with automated driving systems and features (otherwise typically known as Autonomous Vehicles (AVs)) in terms of road safety, reduced emissions and convenience, but are still wary of their capability, preferring the & lsquo;comfort zone & rsquo; of human operator intervention. Motorcyclists and cyclists conversely, are vulnerable to human fallibility in driving, with the majority of crashes occurring as a consequence of other drivers & rsquo; inattention. The transition period associated with the introduction of AVs will require AVs and motorcyclists/ cyclists sharing the road for a number of years yet, so we need to understand motorcyclists & rsquo;/cyclists & rsquo; perception of AVs. The question of interest here is whether motorcyclists/cyclists reflect the historical literature in this area by having higher levels of trust for human drivers over AVs, or whether they have higher levels of trust in AVs because it removes the & lsquo;human element & rsquo; that has been proven to be particularly dangerous for them. Here we surveyed motorcyclists and cyclists about their trust in human drivers and AVs, and developed a novel suite of questions designed to interrogate the difference between trust in general versus trust as a concept of their own personal safety. Some of the salient outcomes suggest that motorcyclists have medium to low levels of trust for both human drivers and AVs, but are significantly more likely to believe that AVs are safer in terms of their own personal safety, such as prioritising or detecting the rider, compared to human drivers. This relationship varies with age and crash experience. The results here are consistent with the logic that motorcyclists/cyclists have a heightened sense of vulnerability on the road and welcome the introduction of AVs as a way of mitigating personal risk when riding. This insight will be crucial to the subsequent roll-out of AVs in the future.Crown Copyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：道路使用者和普通人口宽大认识到具有自动化驾驶系统和特征的车辆的价值（否则通常称为自主车辆（AVS）），在道路安全方面，减少排放和便利性，但仍然是其能力的威胁，更喜欢＆lsquo;舒适区和rsquo;人类操作员干预。摩托车手相反，骑自行车者易受人类驾驶中的识别，随着其他司机和rsquo的结果发生了大多数崩溃;注意力。与推广的引入相关联的过渡期将需要AVS和摩托车手/骑自行车者在多年内分享道路，所以我们需要了解摩托车手和rsquo; /骑车者＆rsquo;对AVS的看法。这里兴趣的问题是摩托车手/骑自行车者通过对人类司机的信任程度更高的信任，或者他们是否具有更高的AVS级别，因为它删除了＆lsquo;人类因素和rsquo ;已被证明对他们特别危险。在这里，我们调查了摩托车手和骑自行车的人关于他们对人类驱动因素和AV的信任，并开发了一种新颖的套件，旨在审查一般信任与信任之间的差异，作为他们个人安全的概念。一些突出的结果表明，对人类驱动程序和AVS的摩托车手具有中小程度的信任，但是更容易相信AVS在自己的个人安全方面更安全，例如优先考虑或检测骑手，比较对人类司机。这种关系随着年龄和崩溃的体验而变化。这里的结果与摩托车手/骑自行车者在道路上有提高的脆弱感，欢迎推出AVS作为一种减轻个人风险的方式，这是一致的逻辑。这种洞察力对于随后的未来推出的AVS至关重要。elsevier有限公司发布的版权（c）2021版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号