首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Attitudes towards the role of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the decision-making process for spatial-infrastructure projects: A Dutch case study
【24h】

Attitudes towards the role of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the decision-making process for spatial-infrastructure projects: A Dutch case study

机译:对成本效益分析在空间基础设施项目决策过程中的作用的态度:荷兰案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides a systematic overview of the attitudes of key actors in the Dutch Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) practice towards the role of CBA in the decision-making process for spatial-infrastructure projects. The main aim of this paper is to scrutinize the extent to which there is agreement among these Dutch actors in regard to the role of the CBA in the decision-making process. A secondary goal is to provide possible explanations for agreements and controversies among key actors in the Dutch CBA practice. In this study two research methods are combined to study the key actors' attitudes. Firstly, 86 key actors (e.g. consultants, scientists, policy makers) were interviewed in-depth. Secondly, 74 of them completed a written questionnaire. The most important conclusion of this paper is that in the Dutch CBA practice there is agreement that CBA must have a role in the appraisal process of spatial-infrastructure projects. However, there is a lot of controversy among economists and spatial planners in the Dutch CBA practice concerning the value that is and should be assigned to CBA in the decision-making process. Economists predominantly believe that not enough value is assigned to the CBA in the decision-making process, whereas spatial planners predominantly think that too much value is assigned to the CBA. Both economists and spatial planners believe that this controversy is problematic as it results in debates about the pros and cons of CBA instead of the pros and cons of the spatial-infrastructure projects. This paper analyzes some solutions for this controversy.
机译:本文系统地概述了荷兰成本效益分析(CBA)实践中关键角色对CBA在空间基础设施项目决策过程中的作用的态度。本文的主要目的是研究荷兰行为体在CBA在决策过程中的作用上达成共识的程度。第二个目标是为荷兰CBA惯例中的主要参与者之间的协议和争议提供可能的解释。在这项研究中,两种研究方法相结合来研究关键角色的态度。首先,对86位主要参与者(例如顾问,科学家,决策者)进行了深入访谈。其次,其中74人完成了书面问卷。本文最重要的结论是,在荷兰的CBA实践中,人们一致认为CBA必须在空间基础设施项目的评估过程中发挥作用。但是,在荷兰的CBA实践中,经济学家和空间规划师之间存在许多争议,涉及决策过程中应分配给CBA的价值。经济学家主要认为,在决策过程中没有将足够的价值分配给CBA,而空间规划师则主要认为为CBA分配了太多价值。经济学家和空间规划者都认为,这种争论是有问题的,因为这引起了关于CBA利弊的辩论,而不是关于空间基础设施项目的利弊的辩论。本文分析了该争议的一些解决方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation Research》 |2013年第12期|1-14|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Transport and Logistics Croup, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, Delft 2628 BX, The Netherlands;

    Transport and Logistics Croup, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, Delft 2628 BX, The Netherlands;

    Transport and Logistics Croup, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, Delft 2628 BX, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    CBA; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Transport appraisal; Role of CBA in the decision-making process;

    机译:CBA;成本效益分析;运输评估;CBA在决策过程中的作用;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号