• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research. D, Transport and Environment >Framing transport-environmental policy: The case of company car taxation in Israel
【24h】

Framing transport-environmental policy: The case of company car taxation in Israel

机译：制定运输环境政策：以色列的公司车税案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Economic tools, include a number of tax-related tools, are often seen as efficient and effective transport-environmental policy tools. However, since tax policies are usually under the authority of non-transport actors, transport-environmental policy makers face a major challenge in mobilizing these actors to promote policies that conform with transport-environmental goals. The challenge can be regarded as a framing exercise since it affects the public debate, the rhetoric against and for the policy, the coalition structure and the likelihood of promoting and implementing the policy. To demonstrate the importance of policy framing, this paper examines the case of Israel's taxation policy on company cars and the efforts to increase these taxes. The policy proposal was framed as a fiscal policy. Both institutional and public discourse concentrated on tax issues and transport and environmental issues were hardly raised. Tradeoffs exist between different choices of policy framing and there is a need to distinguish between institutional framing and public framing.
机译：经济工具，包括许多与税收相关的工具，通常被视为高效，有效的运输环境政策工具。但是，由于税收政策通常是在非运输参与者的权限下进行的，因此，运输环境决策者在动员这些参与者促进符合运输环境目标的政策方面面临着重大挑战。挑战可被视为框架活动，因为它影响公众辩论，反对和针对该政策的言论，联盟结构以及促进和实施该政策的可能性。为了证明制定政策的重要性，本文研究了以色列对公司汽车征税政策的情况以及增加这些税的努力。该政策建议被定为一项财政政策。机构和公共讨论都集中在税收问题上，几乎没有提出运输和环境问题。在不同的政策框架选择之间存在折衷，有必要区分制度框架和公共框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号