• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Would Americans pay more in taxes for better transportation? Answers from seven years of national survey data
【24h】

Would Americans pay more in taxes for better transportation? Answers from seven years of national survey data

机译：美国人会缴纳更多的税收是否更好地运输？从国家调查数据七年的答案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper explores U.S. public opinion about raising new federal transportation revenues, using the results from a national, random-digit-dial phone survey that was conducted for 7years, from 2010 to 2016. The annual surveys tested support for seven versions of a higher federal gasoline tax and two versions of a hypothetical mileage fee. We used both univariate and multivariate analysis to look at how support levels vary according to the specific features of a transportation tax, respondent characteristics, and time. The analysis shows that support for the taxes is tightly linked to the specifics of a tax proposal. For example, far fewer people supported a flat-rate mileage fee for general transportation purposes than supported a gasoline tax rate increases with the revenues dedicated to improving maintenance or safety. The population subgroups most likely to consistently support transportation taxes include young people, Democrats, drivers of fuel-efficient vehicles, and respondents who wanted to see government improve safety, expand transit, and improve maintenance. However, the multivariate analysis shows little variation among subgroups with respect to support for the least and most popular taxes. Finally, support for raising transportation revenue has increased modestly since 2010.
机译：本文探讨了美国舆论提高新的联邦交通收入，利用2010年至2016年为7年进行的全国随机数拨号电话调查的结果。年度调查对七个版本的更高版本进行了支持汽油税和两个版本的假设里程费用。我们使用单变量和多变量分析来了解支持水平如何根据运输税，受访者特征和时间的特定特征而变化。分析表明，税收的支持与税收提案的具体情况紧密相关。例如，较少的人支持一般运输目的的平息里程费用，而不是支持汽油税率随着致力于提高维护或安全的收入而增加。最有可能始终如一地支持运输税的人口亚组包括年轻人，民主党，省油驾驶员的驱动因素，以及希望看到政府改善安全，扩展过境和改善维护的受访者。然而，多变量分析表现出亚组之间的变化很小，以支持最少，最流行的税收。最后，自2010自2010年以来，支持筹集运输收入增加。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation》 |2019年第3期|819-840|共22页
  • 作者

    Nixon Hilary; Agrawal Asha Weinstein;

  • 作者单位

    San Jose State Univ Mineta Transportat Inst One Washington Sq San Jose CA 95192 USA;

    San Jose State Univ Natl Transportat Finance Ctr Mineta Transportat Inst One Washington Sq San Jose CA 95192 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Transportation taxes; Public opinion; Fuel tax; Mileage fee;

    机译：运输税;舆论;燃油税;里程费;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号