首页> 外文期刊>Twentieth Century British History >The Heaton Review, 1927–1934: culture, class and a sense of place in inter-war Yorkshire1
【24h】

The Heaton Review, 1927–1934: culture, class and a sense of place in inter-war Yorkshire1

机译:《希顿评论》,1927-1934年:两次世界大战之间约克郡的文化,阶级和地方感 1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Heaton Review (1927–1934), initially a parish from the Bradford suburb of Heaton, evolved to become an ambitious magazine of literature and the arts. A significant product of middle-class voluntarism in its own right – contributors included Neville Cardus, John Galsworthy, Sir William Rothenstein and even Rabindranath Tagore – it also provides an interesting perspective on the role of local and regional identities within middle-class culture. The magazine celebrated certain aspects of local and regional life, defending the rural landscapes and historic buildings of the locality but without marginalising the urban and the industrial in the manner so frequent within contemporary expressions of ‘Englishness’. At the same time, it sought to challenge the growing cultural hegemony of London and the south-east. While an increasingly ‘national’ middle-class culture has been seen as a feature of the inter-war period, Heaton Review suggests a structure of feeling that might best be described as ‘national-provincial’, typified by an awareness of wider currents but proud of local achievement and anxious to see ‘national’ life as something experienced close to home.
机译:《希顿评论》(1927年至1934年)最初是布拉德福德郊区希顿的一个教区,后来演变为一本雄心勃勃的文学和艺术杂志。中产阶级自愿主义的一项重要产物–内维尔·卡德斯,约翰·高斯沃西,威廉·罗森斯坦爵士甚至拉宾德拉纳特·泰戈尔等做出了贡献,它还为地方和地区认同在中产阶级文化中的作用提供了有趣的视角。该杂志庆祝了当地和地区生活的某些方面,捍卫了当地的乡村风光和历史建筑,但又没有以当代的“英语”表达方式频繁地将城市和工业边缘化。同时,它试图挑战伦敦和东南地区日益增长的文化霸权。虽然越来越多的“民族”中产阶级文化被视为战际时期的特征,但《希顿评论》提出了一种感觉结构,最好将其描述为“民族-省”文化,以对更广泛潮流的认识为代表,但为当地的成就感到自豪,并渴望将“国民”生活视为在家附近经历的事情。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号