CAUSBY AND EFFECT: HOW THE UNIFORM LAW COMMISSION'S MISPLACED RELIANCE ON A 1946 SUPREME COURT CASE THREATENS THE DRONE INDUSTRY

Joshua S. Turner

首页> 外文期刊>Unmanned systems >CAUSBY AND EFFECT: HOW THE UNIFORM LAW COMMISSION'S MISPLACED RELIANCE ON A 1946 SUPREME COURT CASE THREATENS THE DRONE INDUSTRY

【24h】

CAUSBY AND EFFECT: HOW THE UNIFORM LAW COMMISSION'S MISPLACED RELIANCE ON A 1946 SUPREME COURT CASE THREATENS THE DRONE INDUSTRY

机译：懒惰与效果：统一法委员会对1946年最高法院案的过错依赖如何影响了无人机行业

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The dawn of manned aviation more than 100 years ago revolutionized transportation, but what is less well known is that it also sparked a radical rethinking of property rights. As the Supreme Court explained in United States v. Causby in 1946, although historically owning land was thought to convey a property right "to the periphery of the universe," this concept had "no place in the modern world." Congress recognized as far back as the Air Commerce Act of 1926 that "navigable airspace" - that is, the airspace above minimum safe flight altitudes - had to be subject to a "public right of freedom of foreign and interstate air navigation." The result, as the Causby court put it, is that "the air is a public highway."

机译：一百多年前，有人驾驶航空的曙光彻底改变了交通运输业，但鲜为人知的是，它还引发了对产权的彻底反思。正如最高法院1946年在美国诉Causby案中所解释的那样，尽管历史上认为拥有土地可以将财产权“转移到宇宙的边缘”，但是这个概念在“现代世界中没有地位”。国会早在1926年的《空中贸易法》中就承认“可通行领空”，即高于最低安全飞行高度的领空，必须受到“外国和州际空中航行的自由自由权”的管辖。根据Causby法院的说法，结果是“空中是一条公共高速公路。”

著录项

来源
《Unmanned systems》 |2018年第7期|32-34|共3页
作者
Joshua S. Turner;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Reliance Industries to take KG-D6 gas dispute to India’s Supreme Court [J] . Gas Matters Today Group Gas Matters Today . 2009,第Jul2期

机译：Reliance Industries将KG-D6天然气纠纷提交印度最高法院
2. The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that a recent gathering of the Public Service Commission was not a public meeting and it did not have to abide by the state's open meeting laws [J] . NGWs Gas Market Reconnaissance Group NGW's Gas Market Reconnaissance . 2020,第Sepa9期

机译：阿拉巴马州最高法院裁定了最近的公共服务委员会的收集不是公开会议，并且不必遵守国家的公开会议法律
3. V-I-C-T-O-R-Y for the Fashion Industry: Supreme Court Establishes Uniform Test for Protection of Artistic Works Applied to Apparel [J] . Andrea L. Calvaruso, Ana Y. Correa Intellectual property & technology law journal . 2017,第5期

机译：V-I-C-T-O-R-Y用于时尚界：最高法院建立了统一的保护，用于保护艺术作品适用于服装
4. Predicting the Law Area and Decisions of French Supreme Court Cases [C] . Octavia-Maria Sulea, Marcos Zampieri, Mihaela Vela, International conference on recent advances in natural language processing . 2017

机译：预测法国最高法院案件的法律范围和判决
5. Friends of the Supreme Court: Examining the influence of interest groups in the United States Supreme Court, 1946--2001. [D] . Collins, Paul M., Jr. 2005

机译：最高法院之友：审查利益集团在美国最高法院的影响，1946--2001年。
6. Supreme Court rules that FDA cannot regulate tobacco industry [O] . Scott Gottlieb 2000

机译：最高法院裁定FDA无法规范烟草业
7. Amicus Curiae Brief of the Guarini Center on Environmental, Energy and Land Use Law at New York University School of Law in Support of Petitioners (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association, Supreme Court of the United States) [O] . Stewart Richard B., Wyman Katrina M, Spiegel-Feld Danielle 2015

机译：纽约大学法学院瓜里尼环境，能源和土地使用法中心为支持请愿人提供的法庭信息摘要（联邦能源管理委员会诉美国最高法院电力供应协会）

CAUSBY AND EFFECT: HOW THE UNIFORM LAW COMMISSION'S MISPLACED RELIANCE ON A 1946 SUPREME COURT CASE THREATENS THE DRONE INDUSTRY

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅