...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Policy and Research >Public Cities, Public Scholars? Questioning Urban Policy and Research in Australia
【24h】

Public Cities, Public Scholars? Questioning Urban Policy and Research in Australia

机译:公共城市,公共学者?质疑澳大利亚的城市政策与研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This review examines relationships and tensions between urban research and policy impact, drawing on the inaugural Public Cities Lecture at the State of Australian Cities Conference 2015 in honour of the late Paul Mees. It examines the different ways Australian urban researchers are questioning, engaging with and contributing to public policy-and the relative influence of this work in relation to the range of other sources of information now seeming to dominate public debate. Despite a desolate funding environment and a hollowing of demand from government and political leaders for independent research, the varied forms of public scholarship canvassed in this review do suggest an evolution rather than atrophy of urban research in Australia. The question is how we advance, and equally importantly, critically evaluate our changing roles and contributions beyond the usual metrics of academic citations, to help inform, and reform, the parameters of policy debate and action.
机译:此次审查以2015年澳大利亚城市会议上的首届公共城市演讲为纪念已故的保罗·迈斯,探讨了城市研究与政策影响之间的关系和紧张关系。它研究了澳大利亚城市研究人员质疑,参与公共政策并为之做出贡献的不同方式,以及这项工作相对于目前似乎主导公共辩论的其他信息来源的相对影响。尽管资金环境荒凉,政府和政治领导人对独立研究的需求空心化,但本篇评论所探讨的各种形式的公共奖学金的确表明了澳大利亚城市研究的发展而不是萎缩。问题是,我们如何超越同等的学术引用标准来推进(同等重要地)批判性地评估我们不断变化的角色和贡献,以帮助告知和改革政策辩论和行动的参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号