• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Policy and Research >Sinks of Social Exclusion or Springboards for Social Mobility? Analysing the Roles of Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods in Urban Australia
【24h】

Sinks of Social Exclusion or Springboards for Social Mobility? Analysing the Roles of Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods in Urban Australia

机译：社会排斥者还是社会流动性跳板？分析澳大利亚城市弱势社区的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

For two decades analysts have noted significant and growing socio-spatial polarisation in Australia's cities. Dominating policy discourse has been the hypothesis that residence in "poverty neighbourhoods" can compound individual disadvantage. Prominent here are concerns about social exclusion and spatial entrapment. A contrary perspective is that low income communities often contain substantial social capital and that accessing relatively affordable housing available in such places may provide a basis for subsequent "progression" in the wider urban housing market. Drawing on a household survey in four disadvantaged Sydney neighbourhoods, we confirm that rates of socio-economic deprivation indeed substantially exceed citywide and national norms and that the perceived incidence of neighbourhood problems is substantial. At the same time, results reveal that such places are far from unmitigated spaces of alienation and suggest that they can provide springboards for geographical and social mobility.
机译：二十年来，分析人士注意到，澳大利亚城市中的社会空间两极分化日益严重。主导政策讨论的假设是，居住在“贫困社区”会加剧个人不利。这里突出的是对社会排斥和空间陷害的关注。相反的观点是，低收入社区通常拥有大量的社会资本，并且在这些地方获得相对负担得起的住房可能为随后的“进军”更广阔的城市住房市场提供基础。通过对四个处于不利地位的悉尼社区进行的家庭调查，我们确认，社会经济剥夺的比率确实确实超过了全市和全国的正常水平，而且人们认为邻里问题的发生率也很高。同时，结果表明，这些地方与疏远的疏远空间相距甚远，表明它们可以为地理和社会流动提供跳板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号