...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Urban Review >Statement of American Social Scientists of Research on School Desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County
【24h】

Statement of American Social Scientists of Research on School Desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County

机译：美国社会科学家关于学校分离的研究在父母诉西雅图学区和梅雷迪思诉杰斐逊县案中向美国最高法院发表的声明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In June 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review two related cases originating from school districts in Louisville, Kentucky and Seattle, Washington that involved voluntarily adopted racial integration plans. Concerned about the outcome of these cases, 553 social scientists submitted a social science statement to the Supreme Court summarizing the large body of social science research supporting the school districts' policies relevant to the Court's determination. The statement, reprinted here, supports three interrelated conclusions: (1) racially integrated schools provide significant benefits to students and communities; (2) racially isolated schools have harmful educational implications for students; and (3) race-conscious policies are necessary to maintain racial integration in schools. Because of the overwhelming amount of scholarly data, social scientists argued, as the lower courts had found, that the schools boards have a compelling interest to promote racial integration and prevent racial isolation through choice-based school assignment policies that consider race as a factor. On June 28, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the school assignment plans on the grounds that the plans were not narrowly tailored to the interests that the school districts had asserted. In addition to affecting the ability of school districts to maintain racially diverse schools, the decision has broad implications for researchers who seek to help school districts in these efforts.
机译：2006年6月，美国最高法院同意审查两个相关案例，这些案例来自肯塔基州路易斯维尔和华盛顿西雅图的学区，涉及自愿采用的种族融合计划。考虑到这些案件的结果，有553位社会科学家向最高法院提交了一份社会科学声明，总结了大量的社会科学研究，支持了学区与法院裁定相关的政策。该声明在此重印，支持三个相互关联的结论：（1）种族融合学校为学生和社区带来了巨大利益； （2）种族隔离的学校对学生的教育产生有害影响； （3）种族意识政策对于维持学校的种族融合必不可少。正如下级法院所发现的那样，由于大量学术数据，社会科学家认为，学校董事会对通过考虑种族作为因素的基于选择的学校分配政策来促进种族融合和防止种族隔离具有强烈的兴趣。 2007年6月28日，美国最高法院否决了学校作业计划，理由是该计划并非针对学区所主张的利益进行狭义定制。该决定除了影响学区维护种族多样化学校的能力之外，对于寻求帮助学区进行这些努力的研究人员也具有广泛的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号