...
首页> 外文期刊>Vertiflite >Comments on Vertiflite Commentary, 'EASA Publishes SC-VTOL'
【24h】

Comments on Vertiflite Commentary, 'EASA Publishes SC-VTOL'

机译:关于Vertiflite评论,“ EASA发布SC-VTOL”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I was very pleased to read the Commentary section of the September/October issue of Vertiflite, which focused on the EASA Special Conditions for small category VTOL aircraft. Since retiring from Leonardo Helicopters in 2016, I have tried to keep abreast of developments in this exciting new field of aeronautical engineering while also trying hard to keep the "skeptic dragon" living in my head at bay. This is quite hard to do when I try to match viable performance and operational safety with some of the configurations seemingly being created with serious intent. In particular the lack of airworthiness codes that seem to suit these configurations has been a source-of intrigue for me with regard to how each might actually be formally certified as airworthy. Without such certification the application of an eVTOL craft will be sorely limited, which would be a sorry outcome for such a promising technology. Then there is the thorny and equally vital issue of ATC, which I understand the likes of Uber and Google are working hard to resolve, though I am not aware of concrete developments in these matters.
机译:我很高兴阅读Vertiflite的9月/ 10月刊的评论部分,该部分重点介绍了小型VTOL飞机的EASA特殊条件。自2016年从莱昂纳多直升机(Leonardo Helicopters)退役以来,我一直在努力跟上这一激动人心的航空工程新领域的发展,同时也努力使“怀疑之龙”生活在我的脑海中。当我尝试将可行的性能和操作安全性与看似故意创建的某些配置相匹配时,这很难做到。特别是,似乎缺少适合这些配置的适航性规范,这让我很感兴趣,因为它们实际上是如何正式认证为适航性的。没有这样的认证,eVTOL工艺的应用将受到极大的限制,对于如此有前途的技术而言,这将是令人遗憾的结果。然后是棘手且同样至关重要的ATC问题,我了解Uber和Google之类的公司正在努力解决,尽管我不知道这些问题的具体发展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Vertiflite》 |2020年第1期|2-2|共1页
  • 作者

    Jeremy Graham;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号