...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >A tale of five cities: Using recycling frameworks to analyse inclusive recycling performance
【24h】

A tale of five cities: Using recycling frameworks to analyse inclusive recycling performance

机译：五个城市的故事：使用回收框架分析包容性回收绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

'Recycling' is a source of much confusion, particularly when comparing solid waste systems in high-income countries with those in low- and middle-income countries. Few analysts can explain why the performance and structure of recycling appears to be so different in rich countries from poor ones, nor why well-meaning efforts to implement recycling so often fail. The analysis of policy drivers, and the Integrated Sustainable Waste Management (ISWM) framework, come close to an explanation. This article builds on these earlier works, focusing in on five cities profiled in the 2010 UN-Habitat publication (Scheinberg A, Wilson DC and Rodic L (2010) Solid Waste Management in the World's Cities. UN-Habitat's Third Global Report on the State of Water and Sanitation in the World's Cities. Newcastle-on-Tyne, UK: Earthscan Publications). Data from these cities and others provides the basis for developing a new tool to analyse inclusive recycling performance. The points of departure are the institutional and economic relationships between the service chain, the public obligation to remove waste, pollution, and other forms of disvalue, and the value chain, a system of private enterprises trading valuable materials and providing markets for recyclables. The methodological innovation is to use flows of materials and money as indicators of institutional relationships, and is an extension of process flow diagramming. The authors are using the term 'recycling framework analysis' to describe this new form of institutional analysis. The diagrams increase our understanding of the factors that contribute to high-performance inclusive recycling. By focusing on institutional relationships, the article seeks to improve analysis, planning, and ultimately, outcomes, of recycling interventions.
机译：“回收”是造成混乱的根源，特别是在比较高收入国家和低收入和中等收入国家的固体废物系统时。很少有分析家可以解释为什么在富裕国家中与穷国相比，回收的绩效和结构看起来如此不同，或者为什么实施回收的善意努力常常失败。对政策驱动因素的分析以及可持续的废物综合管理（ISWM）框架几乎可以解释。本文以这些早期工作为基础，重点介绍了2010年人居署出版物中介绍的五个城市（Scheinberg A，Wilson DC和Rodic L（2010）《世界城市中的固体废物管理》。人居署关于国家的第三次全球报告《世界城市的水与卫生设施》，英国泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔：Earthscan出版物。这些城市和其他城市的数据为开发新工具分析包容性回收绩效提供了基础。出发点是服务链，消除浪费，污染和其他形式的贬值的公共义务与价值链之间的制度和经济关系，价值链是由私营企业交易有价值的材料并提供可回收资源的系统。方法的创新是利用物质和资金的流动作为制度关系的指标，并且是过程流程图的延伸。作者使用术语“回收框架分析”来描述这种新形式的制度分析。这些图使我们更好地理解了促成高性能包容性回收的因素。通过关注机构关系，本文力求改进对回收措施的分析，计划，并最终改善结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号