...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Water policy report >Exxon Urges 1st Circuit To Continue Stay Of Novel CWA Climate Litigation
【24h】

Exxon Urges 1st Circuit To Continue Stay Of Novel CWA Climate Litigation

机译：埃克森敦促第一巡回电路继续留在新的CWA气候诉讼中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ExxonMobil is urging a federal appeals court to let stand a district court's stay of novel Clean Water Act (CWA) climate change litigation, arguing first that the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review the stay and then saying that if the court finds it has jurisdiction, it should affirm the lower court's order. The Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) "seeks reversal of the district court's order staying this case under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction. Because this Court lacks appellate jurisdiction to review that order, the appeal should be dismissed. If the Court concludes that it has jurisdiction, the stay order should be affirmed," ExxonMobil says in an Oct. 8 brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit. In CLF v. ExxonMobil, the environmental organization makes a number of CWA and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) claims, including that an oil terminal in Massachusetts discharges more pollutants than its CWA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit allows and that Exxon is violating the permit by not considering climate change impacts. The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts stayed the case in March, agreeing with ExxonMobil that it is appropriate to wait until EPA finalizes a renewed permit for the facility next year before proceeding with the case. CLF appealed the stay and argues the stay is indefinitely and unnecessarily delaying court review of the environmental group's claims.
机译：埃克森美孚正在敦促呼吁联邦上诉法院让地区法院的留下小说清洁水法案（CWA）气候变化诉讼，首先争论上诉法院缺乏审查逗留的管辖权，然后表示，如果法院发现它有管辖权，那么它应该肯定较低的法院的秩序。保护法律基金会（CLF）“要求逆转地区法院的命令，在原代司法管辖区的原则下留下这种情况。因为该法院缺乏审查该命令的上诉管辖权，应当解雇上诉。如果法院得出结论，则审理其司法管辖区埃克森美孚应在10月8日向美国上诉法院向第1次巡回方案进行肯定。在CLF v。埃克森美孚，环境组织制造了许多CWA和资源保护和恢复法案（RCRA）索赔，包括马萨诸塞州的石油码头比其CWA国家污染物排放消除系统许可允许，埃克森正在违反污染物许可证不考虑气候变化影响。马萨诸塞州区的美国地区法院于3月留下了案件，同意埃克森美孚，它适合等待，直到EPA在案件诉讼前明年最终确定了该设施的重新许可。 CLF呼吁逗留并认为这是无限期而不必要地推迟环境集团索赔的法院审查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water policy report》 |2020年第22期|16-16|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号