...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Following the proper channels: tributaries in the Mekong legal regime
【24h】

Following the proper channels: tributaries in the Mekong legal regime

机译：遵循适当的渠道：湄公河法律体系中的支流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Mekong is the archetypal dissevered river basin, separated, divided into parts and broken up by ambiguous and undefined terms in the 1995 Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin. The treaty's text generalizes and redefines the concept of a river basin in which tributaries are marginalized and headwaters are excluded, yet on paper the 1995 Mekong Agreement creates the legal fiction of a holistic water resources management paradigm primarily by focusing on the 'imported' (Affeltranger, 2005, p. 54) concept of sustainable development. In effect, transboundary tributaries in the Mekong legal regime are managed by each state unilaterally through application of the limiting language embodied in Article 5(A) which emphasizes hydro-sovereignty. The modern trend and badge of responsibility are to provide a legal framework for the entire watercourse, defined as including its tributaries, and to promote basin-wide governance. Analysis of selected legal regimes and case law demonstrates that ironically, despite their volumetric contributions to flow, tributaries remain at the margin of many legal regimes of international and interstate watercourses including the Mekong. The Lower Mekong River Basin states should consider use of joint development agreements (JDAs), sub-compacts or subsidiary agreements for negotiating and dealing with intrabasin water use and interbasin water diversions on tributaries.
机译：湄公河是典型的被分割的河流域，在1995年的《湄公河流域可持续发展合作协定》中被分成多个部分，并按模棱两可，不确定的术语进行了划分。该条约的文本概括并重新定义了流域的概念，在该流域中，支流被边缘化，上游水源被排除在外，但在纸上，1995年的《湄公河协定》主要着眼于“进口”（Affeltranger），创造了一种整体水资源管理范例的法律虚构。 ，2005年，第54页）。实际上，湄公河法律体系中的跨界支流由每个国家通过应用强调水权主权的第5（A）条所体现的限制语言来单方面管理。现代趋势和责任标志是为整个水道（包括其支流）提供法律框架，并促进流域范围的治理。对选定的法律制度和判例法的分析表明，具有讽刺意味的是，尽管支流在流量方面做出了巨大贡献，但支流仍然处于包括湄公河在内的国际和州际水道的许多法律制度的边缘。湄公河下游流域国家应考虑使用联合开发协议（JDA），小型合同或附属协议，以协商和处理流域内支流和支流间流水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号