...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Hydrology vs sovereignty: managing the hydrological interdependency of international rivers
【24h】

Hydrology vs sovereignty: managing the hydrological interdependency of international rivers

机译:水文学与主权:管理国际河流的水文相互依赖性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In managing international rivers, governments are subject to two different boundaries. The socio-politically constructed boundaries governed by sovereignty and the physical boundaries imposed by the river's hydrology. The existence of a hydrological interdependency within an international basin means that "how" it is managed is important in constructing certainty in water supply. We compare two experiences from Europe and Africa to see the effect of sovereignty on the management of a basin's hydro-interdependency. Portugal and Spain have followed a Westphalian interpretation of sovereignty in the Guadiana basin to develop their physical infrastructure unilaterally and "sever" the hydro-interdependency. In contrast, using an operational interpretation of sovereignty, Guinea, Mali, Mauritania and Senegal have chosen to embrace the Senegal river's hydro-interdependency and develop it jointly. A key lesson that emerges is that the approach used determines the pattern of resilience constructed in each system.
机译:在管理国际河流时,政府受到两个不同的界限。由主权决定的社会政治构造边界和河流水文学所施加的物理边界。国际流域内水文相互依存的存在意味着“如何”管理水文对建立供水的确定性很重要。我们比较了欧洲和非洲的两种经验,以了解主权对流域水上相互依存关系的管理作用。葡萄牙和西班牙遵循了威斯特伐利亚人对瓜迪亚纳盆地主权的解释,以单方面发展其基础设施并“断绝”水上相互依存关系。相比之下,几内亚,马里,毛里塔尼亚和塞内加尔使用主权的业务解释,选择接受塞内加尔河的水上相互依存关系,并共同发展。出现的关键教训是,所使用的方法确定了每个系统中构建的弹性模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号