...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Governance of a shared and contested resource: a case study of the Okavango River Basin
【24h】

Governance of a shared and contested resource: a case study of the Okavango River Basin

机译:共享和竞争资源的治理:以奥卡万戈河流域为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The three riparian states that share the perennial flow of the Okavango watercourse system established the Permanent Okavango River Basin Water Commission (OKACOM) as a basis for managing that river's basin. The institution has a collective responsibility to advise the basin states about the best options for joint utilisation and protection of the basin. This complex task is compounded by the pristine nature of the ecosystems, the pressing development needs of all the basin states and international pressure to protect the unique Okavango Delta. The development of the basin for the benefit of the population requires an understanding of the potential of the natural resources to support identified development options. The Commission is responsible for ensuring good collective governance that meets the objectives and expectations of the sovereign basin states, while strengthening the levels of governance in each individual state. This case study examines the relevance of the trialogue hypothesis, which states that effective interactions between political, social and scientific processes are essential for good governance. The study has revealed that the close relationship between the political will to create a management institution, understanding the needs of civil society and facilitating the scientific investigations required for planning purposes supports the trialogue hypothesis of good environmental governance.
机译:共享奥卡万戈河道水系常年流动的三个沿岸国家建立了奥卡万戈河流域水事常设委员会(OKACOM),作为管理该河流域的基础。该机构负有向流域国提供有关联合利用和保护流域的最佳选择的建议的集体责任。生态系统的原始性质,流域所有州迫切的发展需求以及保护独特的奥卡万戈三角洲的国际压力使这一复杂任务更加复杂。为了造福于人口而开发流域,需要了解自然资源支持已确定的发展选择的潜力。该委员会负责确保符合主权流域国家的目标和期望的良好集体治理,同时加强每个州的治理水平。本案例研究检验了方言假设的相关性,该假设指出,政治,社会和科学过程之间的有效互动对于善政至关重要。该研究表明,建立管理机构的政治意愿,了解民间社会的需求以及促进规划目的所需的科学调查之间的密切关系支持了良好的环境治理的试探性假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号