...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Limits to donor-driven water sector reforms: insight and evidence from Pakistan and Sri Lanka
【24h】

Limits to donor-driven water sector reforms: insight and evidence from Pakistan and Sri Lanka

机译:捐助者推动的水部门改革的局限性:巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡的见识和证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two countries in South Asia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, have embarked upon innovative measures for restructuring their institutional framework for water resources management. Both of these countries have a colonial heritage. Most of their current institutional arrangements for water resources management, particularly in the irrigation sub-sector, are greatly influenced by the laws and administrative procedures introduced during the British colonial period. In the wake of massive investment programmes sponsored by international development aid after independence, each of the two countries has collaborated with donor agencies in designing new institutional development packages. Despite similarities in terms of donor interests, the two countries seemed to be proceeding along different reform paths. Pakistan experimented with an overall change in the irrigation institutions, whereas, Sri Lanka focused on coordinating mechanisms for integrated water resources management at both river basin and national levels. In both of these cases, the progress of reform attempts seems to be grinding to a halt owing to lack of an internally generated demand for reforms.
机译:南亚的两个国家(巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡)已采取创新措施,以重组其水资源管理的体制框架。这两个国家都有殖民历史。他们目前大多数的水资源管理体制安排,特别是在灌溉分部门,受到英国殖民时期引入的法律和行政程序的极大影响。独立后,国际发展援助发起了大规模的投资计划,两国都与捐助机构合作设计了新的机构发展计划。尽管捐助方的利益相似,但两国似乎在沿着不同的改革道路前进。巴基斯坦试验了灌溉机构的总体变化,而斯里兰卡则侧重于协调流域和国家两级水资源综合管理的机制。在这两种情况下,由于缺乏内部产生的对改革的需求,改革的努力似乎停滞了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号