• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Hydro-hegemony - a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts
【24h】

Hydro-hegemony - a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts

机译：水电霸权-分析跨界水冲突的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The increasing structural and physical scarcity of water across the globe calls for a deeper understanding of trans-boundary water conflicts. Conventional analysis tends to downplay the role that power asymmetry plays in creating and maintaining situations of water conflict that fall short of the violent form of war and to treat as unproblematic situations of cooperation occurring in an asymmetrical context. The conceptual Framework of Hydro-Hegemony presented herein attempts to give these two features - power and varying intensities of conflict - their respective place in the perennial and deeply political question: who gets how much water, how and why? Hydro-hegemony is hegemony at the river basin level, achieved through water resource control strategies such as resource capture, integration and containment. The strategies are executed through an array of tactics (e.g. coercion-pressure, treaties, knowledge construction, etc.) that are enabled by the exploitation of existing power asymmetries within a weak international institutional context. Political processes outside the water sector configure basin-wide hydro-political relations in a form ranging from the benefits derived from cooperation under hegemonic leadership to the inequitable aspects of domination. The outcome of the competition in terms of control over the resource is determined through the form of hydro-hegemony established, typically in favour of the most powerful actor. The Framework of Hydro-hegemony is applied to the Nile, Jordan and Tigris and Euphrates river basins, where it is found that current hydro-hegemonic configurations tend towards the dominative form.. There is evidence in each case of power asymmetries influencing an inequitable outcome - at the expense of lingering, low-intensity conflicts. It is proposed that the framework provides an analytical paradigm useful for examining the options of such powerful or hegemonized riparians and how they might move away from domination towards cooperation.
机译：全球范围内日益严重的水结构和物理短缺，要求对跨界水冲突有更深入的了解。常规分析倾向于淡化权力不对称在造成和维持水冲突而不是暴力战争形式的情况下所扮演的角色，而将其视为在不对称情况下发生的毫无问题的合作情况。本文介绍的水事礼节概念框架试图赋予这两个特征-权力和不断变化的冲突-在长期和深刻的政治问题中它们各自的位置：谁得到多少水，如何以及为什么？水权霸权是流域一级的霸权，是通过水资源控制策略（例如资源捕获，整合和遏制）实现的。这些战略是通过一系列策略（例如胁迫压力，条约，知识建设等）执行的，这些策略是在国际制度薄弱的情况下利用现有的权力不对称而实现的。水行业以外的政治进程以从霸权领导下的合作所产生的收益到统治的不平等方面等形式来配置流域范围的水政治关系。竞争在控制资源方面的结果是通过建立水权霸权的形式来确定的，通常是最有实力的演员所青睐的。水力霸权框架适用于尼罗河，约旦，底格里斯河和幼发拉底河流域，在这里发现当前的水力霸权格局趋向于主导形式。有证据表明，在每种情况下，权力不对称都会影响不平等的结果。 -以挥之不去的低强度冲突为代价。建议该框架提供一种分析范式，可用于检查这种强大或霸权的河岸主义者的选择以及他们如何从统治转向合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号