...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Treaties can be a non-starter: a multi-track and multilateral dialogue approach for Brahmaputra Basin
【24h】

Treaties can be a non-starter: a multi-track and multilateral dialogue approach for Brahmaputra Basin

机译：条约可能不会起步：雅鲁藏布江盆地的多轨和多边对话方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Countries sharing the Brahmaputra River have for decades deliberated on formulating and implementing cooperative strategies to develop the potential of the basin. Yet, little progress has been made so far at the government-to-government track 1 level in achieving regional cooperation due to the diverse national interests of the riparian countries. This has led to tension and friction among co-riparian nations and mistrust at political level. Drawing from the Brahmaputra Dialogue, this paper aims to highlight the merit of multi-track and multilateral dialogue processes for building trust and confidence between the riparian countries – paving a way towards transboundary cooperation. The paper concludes that given the geo-politics and the national interests of each riparian nation, negotiation for a treaty for cooperation through track 1 diplomacy, in the Brahmaputra River Basin (BRB), is a non-starter. Multi-track and multilateral dialogues can provide a platform to pursue positive interactions and can be viewed as an extension to existing state-diplomacy in BRB, to bring about sustainable change in the basin management.
机译：共享布拉马普特拉河的国家数十年来一直在考虑制定和实施合作战略以开发该流域的潜力。然而，由于河岸国家的不同国家利益，到目前为止，在政府对政府的第一轨道上，在实现区域合作方面进展甚微。这导致沿河国家之间的紧张和摩擦以及在政治层面上的不信任。本文从《雅鲁藏布江对话》中汲取灵感，旨在强调多渠道和多边对话进程在建立沿岸国家之间的信任和信心方面的优点，从而为跨界合作铺平道路。本文得出的结论是，考虑到每个沿岸国家的地缘政治和国家利益，在布拉马普特拉河流域（BRB）通过第一轨道外交进行合作条约的谈判是没有开始的。多方和多边对话可以提供一个寻求积极互动的平台，并且可以被视为BRB现有国家外交的延伸，以实现流域管理的可持续变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号