...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>West European Politics >New Modes of Governance and the Participatory Myth
【24h】

New Modes of Governance and the Participatory Myth

机译：新的治理模式与参与式神话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One of the most common arguments about 'new governance' is that it is characterised by heterarchy rather than by hierarchy, creating horizontal modes of governance among a multitude of actors - public and private - involving all relevant stakeholders. Often implicitly and sometimes explicitly, this argument is linked with a normative democratic claim that praises the particular participatory features of 'new governance' as compared to 'old governance'. Using as a case study European occupational health and safety policy, characterised by a shift from 'old' to 'new governance' since the 1990s, this article warns us that one should be very reluctant in making normative claims on new governance. The analysis of new governance modes such as comitology, agency networking, and social dialogue in this field shows that more horizontal and heterarchical governance does not mean automatically more participatory governance in terms of involving civil society actors and all stakeholders.
机译：关于“新治理”的最普遍的论点之一是，它的特点是等级制而不是等级制，在涉及所有利益相关者的众多参与者（公共和私人）之间创建了横向治理模式。这种论点通常是隐含的，有时是显性的，与规范性民主主张联系在一起，该主张赞扬“新治理”与“旧治理”相比的特殊参与特征。本文以欧洲职业健康与安全政策为案例研究，该政策的特征是自1990年代以来从“旧”向“新治理”的转变，它警告我们，人们不应该对新治理做出规范性主张。对这一领域的新治理模式（如承诺论，代理网络和社会对话）的分析表明，就公民社会参与者和所有利益相关者的参与而言，更多的横向治理和等级治理并不意味着自动进行更多的参与式治理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号