• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Wissenschaftsrecht >Zwischen Loyalität und Widerstand
【24h】

Zwischen Loyalität und Widerstand

机译：在忠诚和抵抗之间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This year's November 18th sees the 180th anniversary of the Göttingen Seven's protestation. In their note to the Göttingen university's board, the professors opposed the annulation of the kingdom's constitution by King Ernst August (the Duke of Cumberland), as well as theirhaving been exonerated from their oath on the constitution of 1833. Their resulting dismissals from office – some were even banished – were met with much sympathy at the time. Posterity's judgment has been significantly influenced by historian Heinrich von Treitschke. In his judgment,Ernst August was a "law-breaker without shame or honour", the Seven, in constrast, akin to national heroes. An in-depth inspection of the legal situation leads to a different appraisal, however. Neither was the King's behaviour clearly against the law, nor was the Seven's legal viewpoint undoubtedlycorrect. The root cause of this ambiguity is constitutionalism's inability to resolve the tension between the monarchic principle and the budding parliamentary democracy in the debate concerning the question who the sovereign is in a polity.
机译：今年的11月18日是哥廷根七世抗议活动180周年。在致哥廷根大学董事会的笔记中，教授们反对恩斯特·奥古斯特国王（坎伯兰公爵）宣布废除王国宪法，并反对1833年宪法宣誓就职。有些甚至被放逐了-当时充满了同情。后世的判断受到了历史学家海因里希·冯·特雷奇克的重大影响。根据他的判断，恩斯特·奥古斯特是一个“没有耻辱或荣誉的违法者”，与此相反，七人类似于民族英雄。但是，对法律状况的深入检查会导致不同的评估。国王的行为显然不是违法的，七国的法律观点无疑也是正确的。这种模棱两可的根本原因是，宪政主义无法解决君主制与新兴的民主制议会之间的矛盾，这涉及到谁是主权国家的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号