...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Women & Health >Perpetuating a??Scientific Motherhooda??: Infant Feeding Discourse in Parents Magazine, 1930-2007
【24h】

Perpetuating a??Scientific Motherhooda??: Infant Feeding Discourse in Parents Magazine, 1930-2007

机译：延续“科学的母亲身份”：《父母杂志》中的婴儿喂养话语，1930-2007年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although breastfeeding initiation rates have recently been at an all-time high, duration continues to be considerably low. Given the health benefits associated with extended breastfeeding, this discrepancy is cause for concern. This research examined the messages conveyed about infant feeding in a popular parenting magazine, Parents magazine, from 1930 through 2007. Findings indicated that the messages about infant feeding shifted in accordance with changing ideologies about the means of infant feedinga??from bottle-feeding to breastfeeding. However, even with changing attitudes toward infant feeding, writers used scientific evidence and the advice of a??expertsa?? to justify the dominant form of feeding. The absence of practical advice regarding breastfeeding challenges, especially from a??reala?? women set up false expectations about the breastfeeding experience, painting it as a??naturala?? and best for the baby. The dependency on experts and lack of practical advice in popular media, like Parents magazine, may help explain a societal trend that downplays breastfeeding obstacles, giving insight into the vast discrepancy between breastfeeding initiation and duration.View full textDownload full textKEYWORDSbreastfeeding, expert, scientific motherhood, magazine, parentingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2010.480905
机译：尽管近来母乳喂养开始率一直处于历史最高水平，但持续时间仍然很低。鉴于延长母乳喂养对健康的益处，这一差异值得关注。这项研究调查了1930年至2007年间流行的育儿杂志《父母》中传达的关于婴儿喂养的信息。研究结果表明，关于婴儿喂养的信息根据婴儿喂养方式的意识形态变化而发生了变化，从奶瓶喂养到婴儿喂养。哺乳。然而，即使对婴儿喂养的态度发生了变化，作家们还是使用了科学证据和“专家”的建议。证明主要的喂养方式。缺乏有关母乳喂养挑战的实用建议，尤其是来自“ reala”的建议妇女对母乳喂养的经历建立了错误的期望，将其描绘成“自然”的形象。最适合宝宝对专家的依赖以及诸如《父母》这样的流行媒体缺乏实用建议，可能有助于解释一种社会趋势，这种趋势淡化了母乳喂养的障碍，从而洞悉了母乳喂养开始和持续时间之间的巨大差异。查看全文下载全文关键词母乳喂养，专家，科学的母性，杂志，育儿相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b” }; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”：true，“ ui_click”：true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2010.480905

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号